Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Norwich North by-election

So, the anticipated date for the Norwich North by-election—triggered by the deselection and subsequent resignation of unrepentant, troughing Labour bastard Dr Ian Gibson—has been announced, and it is expected to be on the 23rd July.

On the day that ConHome announce that 18 year old Oliver Johnstone has become the youngest Conservative Association Chairman in history (a tip of the horns to Iain Dale), the Libertarian Party has announced that it is fielding the youngest candidate ever to stand for Parliament—18 year old Thomas Burridge.
Brown and Cameron and Clegg have all given their support to the involvement of younger people in the parliamentary system, now let's see what the voters think.

Thomas agrees and has this to say:
"Most sensible people will be saying 'what the hell does he know about anything?' Well this is what I do know: the last twelve years of Labour has left my generation in massive debt; my generation will be paying off the excesses of the last twelve years for the rest of our lives; not only my generation, but our as yet unborn children.

"Did we have any say in spending the rest of our lives in debt? No we did not.

"I am from the Debt Generation, and only LPUK has fresh answers from a new Generation."

At 18 Thomas is very mature, despite his very youthful looks, so don't be fooled, and don't be put off by the already mounting voices who are saying that he cannot know anything at 18.

Thomas recognises the debts, knows where the faults lie, and has answers and policies that can make a real difference to the way in which we are governed.

This is LPUK's first Parliamentary election and we are likely to be out-gunned and out-spent. However, we intend to adopt the same tactic that gained us 7% of the vote in the recent council election—we intend to go knocking on doors.

If you would like to help out—either financially or, just as importantly, on the ground—then we would love to have your support: I shall let you know in a wee bit how you can most effectively do that.

In the meantime, and via the Daily (Maybe), Ladbrokes' odds on LPUK winning in Norwich North are 500/1. Perhaps I'll shove a few quid on, just for a bit of a giggle...


Anonymous said...

Maybe you should shove a lot on the tory winning and use the profits to fund the LPUK campaigns.

Anonymous said...

It doesn't matter about his age, his appearance or whatever, only about his logic, reasoning and goals.

I'd vote for him if I lived there.

countdruncula said...

Your memory aint exactly fucking elephantine, DK.

What makes this little shit think that, at 17, she knows fucking anything at all?

Devil's Kitchen said...

You aren't the first one to point that out, my dear count.


Pogo said...

I'm also inclined to second druncula's comment.

However, unlike the little Labour Princess - who was going to be parachuted into a safe seat - the child representing the UKLP hasn't a cat-in-hell's chance of winning - so it could be seen as good experience for him.

Mr Potarto said...


It would be good experience for him, but it also tells the voters of Norwich North that LPUK aren't seriously contesting the election and don't really want to win.

Table Bear said...

*Drops a shiny coin into Blimp Fund*

Henry North London 2.0 said...

Hes a local guy Would you vote for someone local or someone parachuted in like the Labour candidate?

NHS Fail Wail

I think that we can all agree that the UK's response to coronavirus has been somewhat lacking. In fact, many people asserted that our de...