Both Tim Ireland and , in particular, Unity have pulled apart the latest whining load of old bollocks from proven liar, general thicko and all-round nasty piece of work, Nadine Dorries (do you think that her daughters are ashamed yet?); since her pathetic excuse for a blog doesn't have proper deep linking, here is the latest bullshit in full.
Hounds of Hell
Posted Wednesday, 14 May 2008 at 11:07
The Hounds of Hell are chasing me.
We received another unpleasant parcel in the post today. Nasty web sites set up...
Really, Nadine? Show me the money! Or, rather, a link.
...email account and post bag bombarded...
How unusual for an MP, eh?
people crawling all over my expenses, which they are entitled and I am very very happy for them to do...
Yes, because the word "crawling" has such positive connotations in this context, does it not?
Scary, threatening angry and downright nasty phone calls.
What? Like, "Nadine: this is the truth calling. I'd just like to..." [Nadine slams down the receiver.]
A message smeared on my window.
Was it "clean me"?
This is all meant to destabilise or distract me.
Or, alternatively, drive you to suicide, which would be a far more satisfying outcome.
Mind you, I should point out that I have not been doing nasty things; I did consider sending her a turd a box, but I decided that she simply wasn't worth the effort.
I have a very clear message to those who are attempting to do this—back off. You will not stop me, you will not undermine me, you do not scare me. In fact, you make me much more determined than I ever was before. You give me strength.
And you give me strength, Nad. Well, not you precisely; it's just that every time that I read your crap, I end up yelling, "god! Give me strength!"
I received a lovely email today from the photographer who took the picture of Samuels’s hand reaching through his mother’s womb during the operation when he was 21 weeks gestation.
The picture below is of Samuel giving evidence to the US congress five years later.
God! Give me strength! We've already been through this, Nad; Samuel did not reach through the womb because the fucker was anaesthetised! Through placental transfer! The surgeon in charge who was performing the damn operation has denied that anything of the sort happened! You stupid fucking bitch!
The email reads:"Dear Ms Dorries,
I can’t tell you how honoured I was to hear that you had posted the picture of Samuel reaching from his mother’s womb on your blog in an attempt to lower the age abortions can be performed……
I have been on pins and needles trying to keep up with the vote there in the UK….I would love to know if the attempt is successful…"
I think that it was very nice of Michael to feel "honoured" rather than insisting that Nad had infringed his copyright.
Further, I must admit to doing Michael Clancy an injustice when I last wrote about this issue: I implied that he was just in it for the money but now it appears that he was lying like a Dorries not only for the money but also because he himself supports curbs on abortion.
Anyway, back to the main attraction.
I will Michael if I survive long enough!!!
Well, I think that the obvious answer to this is that we hope that you don't but fear that you will. Oh well, one can't have everything. Although, I wonder how much it would cost to send Nadine a stout hempen noose through the post...
As a final aside, one should note that Nadine Dorries maintains that she only supports a reduction to 20 weeks. This, too, is a lie.
Via Unity posting at Liberal Conspiracy, I notice that Nadine Dorries—campaigning vigorously for 20 weeks because of all of that compelling research which says 20 is juuuuust right—has also signed up to support an amendment for 16 weeks.
Perhaps someone would like to ask her which bit of her own argument for 20 weeks which was so unconvincing.
Quite. But it also seems that even 16 weeks is too much for Nadine.
Then here's Dorries from last October (via Unity).You are right about one thing, I do want to go lower than 20 weeks—I would settle for the European average of 13 weeks, but would prefer 9.
It's also helpful to remember that she allies herself with those who oppose all abortion on principle - and that she's made no attempt to distance herself from those hardline views. Oh, and there's also a post at Conservative Home, arguing for "20 weeks not 22 weeks" which conveniently omits to mention that she's signed up to support 16 weeks but would prefer something much, much lower. Pick a number, any number?
Is there absolutely anyone out there who can possibly believe that Dorries is in any way sincere, consistent or believable when she talks about her beliefs about abortion?
Anyone? Bueller? Bueller...?