Global warming can mean colder, it can mean drier, it can mean wetter, that's what we're dealing with.
—Steven Guilbeault, Greenpeace 2005, as quoted by Canada Free Press
Afterwards, another activist clarified the remark by stating that of course taller can also be evidence of shortness, richer can mean living in poverty, baboons can mean chairs, giraffes can mean pencils and hello Ms. Robinson, your lacy trousers are well buttered with smoked trout, can you hear what I'm writing with my toaster?
It seems to me that what all of these global warming scientists are actually dealing with is the fact that their theories are rapidly being disproved and they are going to have to really scrabble around for some loony justifications in order to keep bidding for those ever-decreasing funds.
Because not onlt is mankind not actually causing global warming, but the warming itself is only in the "corrections" made by those self-same climate scientists. Oh, and for those who think that the IPCC is infallible (because it's known by big important initials, or something), can you say Mann hockey-stick graph...?