Friday, March 09, 2007

Scientists can be lying bastards too

A number of people have derided my somewhat sceptical stance on global warming—including this former head of Channel 5 News and current journalism lecturer who dismissed your humble Devil on 18DS as a "flat earther" (one of the other guests described Mr Monck as "the kind of man who watches himself in the mirror whilst wanking")—often citing this "global scientific concensus".

Not only does this concensus not exist, but people seems to imbue scientists with the wisdom of the gods. In ancient Greece, these same people would be wandering around predicting certain doom because "the priest saw it in the bird entrails. I don't know how it's done but the priest must be correct."

Part of the trouble is the woeful scientific knowledge of the general population, especially amongst journalists and politicians; because they do not understand how scientific theories are constructed and tested and because they do not understand what the raw data presents, they tend to accept the bite-sized summaries that scientists publish for them.

And the trouble is that scientists are neither infallible nor incorruptable. Most scientists in this country compete for the increasingly scarce government hand-outs and are thus under pressure to overstate the importance of their work and, indeed, its validity.

Let us take the BSE scandal which was one of the first things that I studied on my Microbiology degree course (and have written about before); remember how thousands were going to die of vCJD? If you'd care to look at the Wikipedia write-up on CJD, you will find some very strange ideas.
It usually affects people aged 45–75, most commonly appearing in people between the ages of 60–65. The exception to this is the more recently-recognised 'variant' CJD (vCJD), which occurs in younger people.

Really? So specific a time period? You'll have to take my word for this, but I remember seeing an article about a man killed by "vCJD": he was 47. This is well within the accepted constraints of normal CJD.

Anyway, the fact is that after the BSE scare, we were all doomed. Tens of thousands of people were going to die, remember? And do you remember how that actually hasn't happened? Since the BSE scare in the late 80s, 148 people have died in Britain of CJD.
CJD occurs worldwide at a rate of about 1 case per million population per year.

So, since 1987 until 2004, 148 people have died in Britain. However, in that 17 years—assuming the population of Britain to be 60 million—the number of people who should have died, given the above incidence, is actually 17 x 60 = 1020.

Faced with a total fucking lack of Armageddon, scientists had to continue to justify their grants. "Ah," they said in a panic, "actually vCJD probably has a 50 year incubation period." Really? Right For Scotland debuncked this in massive detail.

He also tackles the concept of prions.
Now, the vCJD fear peddlers would have us believe that we can catch Mad Human disease by eating infected meat. What a load of crap.

When you cook the heat denaturises the protein contained within it. As BSE is a prion disease characterised by a folded protein cooking would denaturise it (or as Wikipedia put it “Once denatured, a protein loses most, if not all of its biological activity”).

Even then we have to be eating offal. Those of us eating steak remain unaffected.

But then the meat is in your stomach. These alleged scientists would have us believe that the protein, having survived being denaturised, will now be able to plant itself in your brain where it will make you loopy then kill you.

However, scientists have come up with the concept of prions as a vector for CJD. In order to do so, they have described a protein type that acts utterly unlike any other; one that can apparently survive not only intense heating (if you've ever handled raw meat and cooked meat, you'll understand that there is a quite substantial difference in texture and structure), but also survive the digestion process ("Ingested proteins are broken down through digestion, which typically involves denaturation of the protein through exposure to acid and degradation by the action of enzymes called proteases").

This amazing molecule, having totally resisted two processes that destroy all other known proteins, then makes its way to the brain (how? A protein molecule would find it very difficult to enter the bloodstream) and then acts only on that organ. Is it sounding far-fetched yet?

Here are the facts: prions are present in the brain of those with CJD, but scientists do not know what the transmission vector for CJD is. Essentially, we have been subbject to a massive con by scientists.

You could, of course, maintain that I am not qualified to say this stuff, but let's go over to EU Referendum for anecdotal proof of scientists lying.
When he arrived at the farm to conduct a field investigation, however, the epidemiologist had told the farmer's wife that, "I'm almost a hundred percent sure it was caused by eggs". He then proceeded to "prove" just that.

But there was a slight problem with his thesis. The event had actually been styled as a "paté party" and several home-made patés have been made by villagers for the event, one of which was made with chicken livers from a broiler flock. This, subsequently, had been found to be contaminated with exactly the same type of salmonella as had infected the guests.

Thus, when the epidemiologist carried out a statistical analysis of the data, using a technique called a "cohort study", three of seventeen people who had been ill had not eaten the ice-cream but had eaten a paté. In a private letter to the farmer, he was forced to conclude that the source of the infection "was impossible to prove epidemiologically".

The trouble was that it did not end there. Some months later, an outline of the investigation appeared in the authoritative Communicable Disease Report, attributing the source of infection to eggs, details of which were subsequently published in the equally authoritative Epidemiology and Infection and the British Medical Journal, later forming part of the official government evidence.

In the published account, however, there were important changes to the data. The epidemiologist had removed any reference to the sufferers who had not eaten the ice-cream and had re-worked the calculations, which now demonstrated a very strong statistical association between the consumption of a product made with raw shell-eggs and the illness.

On that basis, the outbreak was submitted as official government evidence to the House of Commons select committee investigating the affair and became subsumed, unchallenged, as part of the core evidence "proving" the link between salmonella and eggs.

The point being that, even were there a scientific concensus on climate change, which there is not, it is not only possible, but probable, that scientists, especially those funded by the state, are subject to poilitical pressures too. Either that, or they are prepared to distort the evidence in order to earn a living.

In short, scientists can be lying bastards too and especially when their wages are paid by those manipulating, biased, venal Whitehall scum.


Praguetory said...

Monck's blog is so tedious it's best described as an endurance test. Slightly off-topic, but his arguments on Europe were incredibly weak, but he looked ready to explode at any opposition. Is he fishing for a job at the Beeb?

Anonymous said...

Nice blog!

Anonymous said...

The Great Global Warming Swindle

here is another one

Here is the web page of the documentary.

Anonymous said...

The Atom Bomb Hoax and more jewish lies..

Item 1)

The historical seismograms of Hiroshima and Nagasaki have mysteriously vanished. If not only for the sake of war-era memorabilia, that information should have been everywhere in the museums and in the press. Hiroshima is located in a highly volcanic zone called the Honshu Arc and those active volcanoes were under constant seismographic surveillance during that period and log before that. The so-called atomic blast at hiroshima was estimated to be the equivalent of 6.2 on the Richter Scale but no seismological outpost in the world appears to have noted it. The Russians said they exploded the biggest atomic bomb ever made (50 megatons) at Novaya Zemlya in northern Russia. That is hundreds of thousands of times more powerful than what they say exploded over Hiroshima yet again, not one seismic needle moved at all. How is that possible I ask?

Item 2)

In 1942 Hitler's Lufftwaffe had a plan to bomb Lower Manhatten in New York City USA. This plan included a special transport behemouth to fly the package across the Atlantic and deliver it to the target. This is fully 3 years before Hiroshima yet the so-called atom bomb they said they were using is the exact yield and deployed at the same height as the one they say they dropped on Hiroshima. This suggests to me that the atomic hoaxsters were shopping for a spot to nest the hoax. What other possible explanation can there be? When the US started using what they call atom bombs the used the uranuim hammer configurations but the Hitler model is not specific at that level. So, what is Hitler doing planning atom bomb attacks before he even had the facilities or infrastructure to even start planning such late strategies. They never said what they would replace that bomb with if it fell into the ocean with the plane. Why would he not have delivered the package by boat instead. How do we explain these contradictions?

Item 3)

The so-called nuclear industry, be it weapons or so-called commercially viable nuclear reactors is the hoaxster's paradise. The whole ripoff scheme is shrouded in national security protocols and security bonding which means you can't discuss your work outside the plant if you don't want to incur the wrath of the NSA and risk jailtime for attempted so-called nuclear terrorism. The whole scam is compartmentalized so Sam doesn't know what George is up to. Perfect cover for the atom bomb hoax clusters. So perfect in fact that I believe the jews could not resist pulling off those massive long-cons on the people of the world. How can they NOT have done it when the opportunities, the means and the motives were all there for them to exploit?

Item 4)

During the so-called billion-dollar east coast of the United States blackout a good portion of that area was completely without power. How is this possible when so many so-called nuclear reactors were supposed to have autonomy? How is that possible that people can shell out 5 billion dollars to build a reactor and it can't light a lightbulb when the grid goes down. My contention is that the reason the power failure is so absolute is because the conventional sources are fueling the hoax reactors. Who would build a distribution grid for electricity like a superhighway that cloggs up when two cars collide on a country road? Nobody would design a grid where a reactor can't support it's customers when the other grid elements are compromised. I say this is further evidence of the hoax. How can it be otherwise?

Item 5)

The mushroom cloud thermodynamics of the atom bomb hoax have also been examined. The first problem the competant examiner notices with the mushroom cloud photographed on the day Hiroshima was attacked is that the sun is shining brightly overhead at the noon position. The bombing was said to have been at 8:15 am. I have heard it argued that this was the Nagasaki cloud but it has been used by the hoaxsters themselves for Hiroshima and Justin Raimondo had this exact cloud for his essay, Hiroshima, Mon Amour. Why would the jews want to say it is Nagasaki if they have nothing to hide? I went to the public library in downtown Montreal as a youth and I looked at microfilm of newspapers for that day in 1945 and the picture I enlarged taken from the microfilm was the cloud at noon and it was Hiroshima indeed. So, more evidence of a hoax?

Item 6)

The firebombing of Tokyo March 9-10, 1945-100,000 dead. M-69 aimable cluster firebombs reduced 26 square kilometers of that city to ash using a few hundred U.S. Air Force B-29 bombers. Aside the cost of the aircraft when initially built the cost of destroying all that section of Tokyo was a little more than a million dollars. So, why build anything that costs billions to destroy a fraction of the land those B-29 bombers could have destroyed in under less than a million dollars? Because the atom bomb was a lie and those cities reduced to ash by M-69 firebombs and that also explains the mysterious vanishing of the historical seismograms of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Are they hiding the fact that there was no shock wave? Is that why the trees were still standing charred and many building facades still standing?

Item 7)

Hiroshima was not evacuated and life came back to normal very quickly. This is inconsistent with the models presented by the experts that said nothing would grow for 70 years and nobody could live there for a very long time. One week after the so-called atom bomb, oleanders were growing everywhere. The hoaxsters started stories of a miracle. More contradiction and nonsense from the jewish hoaxsters.

Item 8)

The pilot of the B-29 they said dropped the so-called atom bomb on Hiroshima is a known Hollywood insider and his B-29 crew was totally segregated on an island with the pilot Commander Tibbits fully in charge of security and everything. He had full autonomy and discretion. I believe his crew of talmudic cowards was near 200 aircraft when they sortie'd on Hiroshima then later on Nagasaki. Another brilliant example of the secrecy and security shroud of compartmentalization over the whole hoax. Why would this dumbass put his mother's name on an instrument of utter genocide if it were not that his mother gloats without end at jewish hoax accomplishments and mass murder that she would be pleased to figure prominently on the nose of that beast of destruction and mass murder. How can anyone believe such a mess of contradictions when it is obvious they would have been nuts not to exploit the means they had at their disposal under those circumstances. They pulled it off while everyone on earth was in a state of shock and would have believed anything the jews said just to stop the ignited gasoline showers?

Item 9)

Items said to be radioactive have in fact been doped with x-ray radiation for periods of time corresponding to the hoax expectations. At the Pantex assembly plant in Amarillo Texas they have a very powerful x-ray machine they say they use to look inside decomissioned so-called atom bombs before they open them up. That is totally rediculous because why would anything be wrong inside a bomb watched by the military night and day. I say the x-ray machine is there to dope the materials they assemble so that the x-ray detectors they call rad meters can read something expected from the mathematical models. When a rad meter is picking up x-ray radiation it is seemlessly and logarithmically converting this sampled energy and reporting the results as rads instead of x-ray energy that it is. When a student examines a sample said to be radioactive it is a sample irradiated prior using a high intensity x-ray machine. Again compartmentalization plays a key role here at the Pantex plant. Coincidentally they are the only plant in the US authorized to make the final assemblies of so-called nuclear bombs. What else could they be using that huge x-ray machine at Pantex if it is not to create illusions of atomic radioactivity?

Item 10)

Einstein the plagerist. At least a few links provided at my Hiroshima thread deal with the question of Einstein's honesty in claiming the authorship of a lot of his predecessor's work. Some say his wife was more the mathematical genius and coached him a lot. Anyways the original and official story of the creation of the first so-called atom bomb says that Einstein gave the letter he wrote to the president of the United States to a financier in New York that bounced it around town for a week before giving it to the president. This was a letter explaining in terms a president could understand that atom bombs can be made. The story says that everyone was paranoid that Hitler would discover the plan to build a bomb yet they let the letter concerning it's so-called feasibility float around town for a week. More contradiction.

Item 11)

The jewish question. Can anyone deny that the jews had the means, the motives, and the opportunities to hoax the world with fake atom bombs and fake CVNEs and fake DU and the fake nuclear navy? They even faked moonlandings and NAZIS holocausts lying bastards that they are. They call their genocides wars and failed diplomacy, degenerate freaks. They faked the dinosaurs too it would appear.

Item 12)

Iraq, why did they not find so-called atom bombs there?


Suicide bombers, since when can't the underworld aquire atom bombs for suicide missions if they are not bogus?

Item 14)

Why 60 years without so-called atom bomb accidental explosions or terrorist explosions? Everything the jews running the government do is sloppy and anyone with entry level skills can steal a package from the military and configure it to their likings. Why has this never occurred with the so-called atom bomb?

Item 15)

The global conspiracy in negotiable instruments run by the jews and indoctrinated into the minds of the poor youth abandoned to those pathetic indoctrination centers called public schools worldwide is a very important factor in the widespread acceptance of the hoax clusters of the atomic variety by the mainsteam public. The jewish monopoly on the mainstream media is also another great element used to ram the hoax down our throats while we are still very young and vulnerable to fear. The gobal ring of jews running all the governments of the world and controlling all the military forces of the planet make the hoax possible also. Who can deny the influence of jews in every country?

Item 16)

So-called nuclear reactors- The buildings and structures as they appear to the human eye in as much as one is permitted to examine without special clearance are real enough and cost real money if we can pretend the money supply is really backed with anything of any real value. Billions of dollars to build each one. I have worked building a pair of reactors in Gentilly Quebec so that appeared real enough at the surface at least. Many people are salaried to work in these buildings and monitor security, supply and maintenance. All this, of course, is to be expected if you want anyone to believe the hoax it has to have at least the appearance of function and form. The real sham starts in the control room. What is a control room anyways you might ask, well, it is a representation of variables said to be operating to achieve the potential predicted in the mathematical models. The truth is that the control panel is an advanced simulator running on highly specific top-secret application software developed secretly a long time ago and refined many times since. So, the unsuspecting employees work all day monitoring variables fed to them by sophisticated digital processors geared to simulate a fully functional reactor core and cooling elements. The fake reactor is tethered to the grid and the energy from conventional sources is fed to the brushes of the generators making them instantly motors instead that circulate the water and perhaps also heat it for effect and steam. The instruments reading the output from the reactor is actually reversing the reading of the power pouring in. Who can deny that such simulator technology was not possible at the time they started those hoaxes?

Item 17)

The money- now there's a good motive for hoaxing these clusters of deceit. How many people making big money in that fake industry feel like letting it all go so the truth be known? They will fight to the death to keep that salary and income no matter how bogus the industry is proven to them to be. Who can deny that important obstacle to the truth? The money stolen because of these hoax clusters is beyond understanding.

Item 19)

Mushroom clouds do not grow out of radial airbrust explosions. The mushroom cloud needs to be seeded from the ground. The thermodynamic conditions caused by a circumferential airburst explosion would superheat the air all around and send radial shock waves emanating from the center outwards like the popular festivity fireworks and that would negate the conditions required for a mushroom cloud to grow normally. A mushroom cloud grows from the ground up in a predictable circular pattern that develops and flows through a relatively cool and stable upper air mass because the explosion was at the ground level. Who can deny that mushroom clouds can't grow out of radial airburst explosions?

Item 20)

The so-called nuclear subs are either fully battery operated and recharged underwater secretly or run with Stirling Cycle engines or more likely both. That would explain the absence of deisel fumes and would explain the very long underwater periods. Stirling cycle engines are perfectly suited to hoax a nuclear navy. Who can deny that?


Anonymous said...

Yeah, I agree. Take a look at this one.

If you go down to the suggested reading/viewing there are several full length documentaries which are just stunning. Also the interviews with Charles Geshekter are good (above the suggested section).

Anonymous said...

Re the previous poster who commented on the 'Atomic Hoax', I am a government agent and my shadowy masters have ordered me to officially scorn this theory.

Anonymous said...

As with the previous poster, the government pays me a huge salary to follow this truth-teller, debunking his theories.

Anonymous said...

I am an agent of the US government, and I demand you stop attempting to reveal our atomic hoax cluster secrets, or you will be imprisoned and tortured by our Jewish torturers.

Oh yeah? So what has happened for the last ten years, exactly?

Over at the ASI, they are posting some of the winning entries of the Young Writers on Liberty. One does not want to put such keen minds off,...