Monday, June 19, 2006

Property rights and ZanuLabour

Now, as far as I am concerned, property rights are fairly important; indeed, it has been suggested by some that the stronger the property rights, the freer the people. In any case, you will know that I view tax as theft (albeit a necessary evil. Up to a point), so you can imagine how pleased I was to find, via The Englishman, this story.
The government came under fierce attack yesterday after quietly bringing in measures to give councils the power to seize the homes of the dead from bereaved families.

Erm... Well, in cetain circumstances, yes. I think that the reporter might be slightly sensationalising the piece by attempting to tap into the kind of fake fucking sympathy that most Telegraph readers eschew, but fair enough.
Ministers were also accused of "burying bad news" by publishing details of the rules while the nation's eyes were trained on the World Cup.

Are we surprised? I think not.
The measures, released by Ruth Kelly, the Communities Secretary, on Friday afternoon, give local authorities the power to confiscate homes that have been vacant for six months and rent them out to the homeless.

From next month councils will be able to break into, alter or refurbish the properties and let them out to tenants of their choice for up to seven years.

Now what the fuck is this shit?! Councils can break into your property, knock down a few adjoining walls and install some smelly, feckless tramp in your home?! What? You fucking cunts.

Ruth Kelly, you fucking piece of shit, you might well be shifted to the top of my hate list (just below Gordo, obviously, who is on my Premiership Hate List) especially since you are a fucking religious twerp too. Burn, you devious little shit, burn!
Exceptions include second and holiday homes and the homes of people working away temporarily.

Wow! Thank you, NuLabour, thank you so much for giving us this exemption. Oh, and the manna from fucking heaven too. You stupid, fascist bastards.
Robert Whelan, of the think-tank Civitas, said the "outrageous" confiscation of property ran "right against the ancient common-law principle of private property, which is as fundamental as habeas corpus.

"The right to private property is the Englishman's right to his castle". Labour was "behaving more like a dictatorship than a democratic government", he said.

Welcome to the party, Robert. NuLabour are fascist so, really, what do you expect?
Yvette Cooper, the housing and planning minister, said, however, that it was an outrage that empty properties were not being used to tackle housing shortages.

I don't give two shits about your "outrage", Yvette. What you are actually saying is that the public sector—which would have severe issues in trying to get a small shindig going in a brewery—has completely fucked up housing as well as everything else.

Of course, it is fairly well-known that this is the case. All of those massive, miserable asbestos-ridden sixties-era towerblocks, all those miserable dirty sink estates: public sector builds, every one of them. Everything that the government touches turns to shit, and expensive shit at that.

Let me suggest an alternative: if you really want to use people's property to house the homeless and the other assorted fuck-ups that your precious fucking Welfare State has failed, why not offer to buy the property off the owners, rather than stealing it? Eh? Or, even better, rent it off them at commercial rates. That way, when something breaks, then it will get fixed in less than six months.

But there is simply no excuse for theft, especially not by the government. I mean, seriously, who's your fucking role model? Mugabe? Or, actually, it's probably Uncle Joe Stalin, isn't it? Fuck you, you fucking shits.

UPDATE: Tom Paine has written an excellent article about this.


Allan Scullion said...

Everything belongs to the State. Surely you know that by now ;-)

Anonymous said...

In other news, it was anounced that new powers were to be given to local councils to break into parked cars so they can be used to supplement public transport.

"At a time when there is desperate shortage of buses and trains, it's ridiculous that much needed transportation is simply sitting idle for hours at a time by the side of the road," a spokesman said.

Tom Paine said...

Allan, in one way it would be better if everything did. At least the State would then bear the capital cost of the asset. For the State to use, free of charge, private assets is worse than Communism.

Even if they don't seize it for use, they still dictate how you use your property. Even changing a window frame now needs planning permission. As I live and work abroad I enquired of the local council what attitude they would take if I installed continental security blinds on my house to protect it during long absences. I never got a reply (how many employees does the public sector need before it actually begins to function?) but I wish I had never asked now. I have signalled to them that it's a target for an EDMO. I have a good defence, thank God, but how much time and money will it cost me to win a tribunal case if the Labour councillor next door (who got a flea in his ear during the last election campaign) decides to take his revenge?

Anonymous said...

"Exceptions include second and holiday homes and the homes of people working away temporarily."

How will they determine what fits into this category..?

Ah, I expect to see local government setting up 'EDMO Enquiry' units any day now.

More public sector workers....hooray!

NHS Fail Wail

I think that we can all agree that the UK's response to coronavirus has been somewhat lacking. In fact, many people asserted that our de...