Saturday, January 14, 2006
Drayson's Law of Irony
Is there no irony in the fact that a Labour donor, whose former company once possessed a massively controversial government contract, should now be a Labour minister (without ever having stood for election) who has said that the Government considers the possibility of selling an item of public property to the public to be 'too complicated and expensive'?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
NHS Fail Wail
I think that we can all agree that the UK's response to coronavirus has been somewhat lacking. In fact, many people asserted that our de...
-
Short answer: no. Slightly longer answer: Vote Leave did play fast and loose with the actual definitions—hey! it's marketing. And in...
-
Sorry, I've not been on my best form recently. I have suspected for some time that the realtionship was not going to last, even to the d...
-
Via Chicken Yoghurt and his exciting new post format, I am reminded of Pigdogfucker , whose post on these peepers I am entirely in agreeme...
No comments:
Post a comment