Saturday, January 14, 2006
Drayson's Law of Irony
Is there no irony in the fact that a Labour donor, whose former company once possessed a massively controversial government contract, should now be a Labour minister (without ever having stood for election) who has said that the Government considers the possibility of selling an item of public property to the public to be 'too complicated and expensive'?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Moonbat still loony
It's always delightful to dip into George Moonbat's nutty articles ... We cannot rely on market forces and corporate goodwill to de...
-
Short answer: no. Slightly longer answer: Vote Leave did play fast and loose with the actual definitions—hey! it's marketing. And in...
-
With the CRU emails having been examined, it seems that some people—mainly techies—are really starting to dig into the data files. These fil...
-
Whilst all of politics seems to be devoted to Brexit at the moment, your humble Devil has stated repeatedly (both before and after the vote)...
No comments:
Post a Comment