Monday, October 11, 2010

Ugly, bald, thieving, jug-eared media whore attacks noble, fearless bloggers

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 10/11/2010 09:21:00 pm

Nightmarish Fraggle, Andrew Marr. Pot, kettle, black.

Yes, ladies and gentlemen, I give you Andrew Marr—NuLabour slut and moron du jour—and his delightfully broad attack on bloggers and other such unworthy people.
"A lot of bloggers seem to be socially inadequate, pimpled, single, slightly seedy, bald, cauliflower-nosed, young men sitting in their mother's basements and ranting.

Your humble Devil lives in a third-floor flat many miles from his mother, has a full head of hair, distinctly unpimpled skin, finely-hewn aquiline features and is most firmly attached to a similarly prepossessing wife (whose opinion may or may not have been sought in the previous description).

Andrew Marr, however, is a bald, jug-eared, media whore whose pathetic and slavish devotion to NuLabour may or may not be influenced by his employment by the extortion-funded BBC and his marriage to Jackie Ashley, the raddled-looking harridan daughter of a life peer who writes for both The New Statesman and The Grauniad.

But, Andrew Marr is at least correct when he accuses bloggers of ranting. After all, whilst many of us are very angry about how our country has been systematically destroyed and our futures mortgaged by his favourite party, we are—alas—unable to use taxpayers' cash to get our points across. This leads to a certain amount of frustration and, inevitably, more than a soupcon of cathartic ranting.

But, as Anna Raccoon shows, we in the blogosphere can do some genuine good by providing crowd-sourcing and expertise to those oppressed by Andrew Marr's favourite little technocrats.

Furthermore, many blogs provide an invaluable insight into certain professions because they are written by people at the sharp end—people who genuinely know what is happening on the ground, or have a specialist knowledge of the subjects that they write about.

Which, for me, provide far more useful information about the true state of affairs than Andrew Marr reading some generalised crap—written by some underpaid graduate with a 2:2 in English Literature—off a fucking autocue. No amount of ridiculous arm-waving, Andrew, can substitute for a coherent piece written by someone who actually knows what they are talking about.

Those people are far more often found on blogs than on the BBC: after all, it wasn't so long ago that we angry, ranting bloggers were pointing out that no one in the BBC's environmental science team actually had anything approaching a science degree.

That said, Andrew Marr is reported as making one valid point.
The so-called "citizen journalists" will never offer a real replacement to newspapers and television news, he told Cheltenham Literature Festival.

He said: "Most citizen journalism strikes me as nothing to do with journalism at all.

This is true: most bloggers and citizen journalists do not (currently) have the resources to go and chase stories, nor do they have the connections (or the lawyers) to verify a great deal of stuff.

However, a large part of what many "journalists" do is not journalism either. These people do not unearth stories, dig them out and research them. No, a great many of these so-called journalists—including Jackie Ashley—are commentators.

And their jobs are, I believe, under threat from bloggers.

After all, in most media organisations, it is the journalists who are paid bugger all—whilst those (like Jackie and darling Polly) who combine ignorance and stupidity with piss-poor writing are the people who rake in six figure salaries.

If I were a cash-strapped media business, I would be looking to dispense with the services of these very expensive commenters (whose output is offered for free elsewhere) and concentrate on the area in which bloggers cannot truly compete—the area of news reporting.

Naturally, the fact that Mrs Marr's job is threatened by those who, often, have fewer constraints, more clearly declared prejudices, better knowledge of their specialist areas and, frankly, a more accessible and enjoyable writing style is—of course—nothing to do with little Andrew's sweeping comments about people that he does not, and cannot, know.
"Terrible things are said on line because they are anonymous. People say things on line that they wouldn't dream of saying in person."

Indeed, Andrew. Perhaps, when we meet, you can repeat your assertions about bloggers and I shall read this post back to you. And then we can all get back to doing what we do best: I can return to insulting media whores like yourself, and you can go back to licking Ed Miliband's bumhole.

In the meantime, how about you try to shut the fuck up...?

Labels: , , , , ,

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 10/11/2010 09:21:00 pm

23 Blogger Comments:

Anonymous Angry Teen said...

Excellent. It was a pleasure to read.

10/11/2010 10:45:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Marr is a cocksucker: that's his wife's tragedy. His wife is not a cocksucker: that's Marr's.

10/11/2010 10:55:00 pm  
Anonymous Katabasis said...

"Andrew Marr, however, is a bald, jug-eared, media whore whose pathetic and slavish devotion to NuLabour may or may not be influenced by his employment by the extortion-funded BBC and his marriage to Jackie Ashley, the raddled-looking harridan daughter of a life peer who writes for both The New Statesman and The Grauniad."

It is important details like these connections that would otherwise go missed if not for the attentions of the blogosphere and - on a good day - Private Eye.

The entire media / Westminster / "Green" bubble is shockingly incestuous, yet of course never draws attention to this fact.

10/11/2010 11:29:00 pm  
Anonymous Mark M said...

"more clearly declared prejudices"

That's the kicker. When I read you, I know what your general view of the world is. Same for Dan Hannan, John Redwood, Will Straw or even the spectacularly misinformed Sunny Hundal.

All of you are quite open about your prejudices which actually makes what you write mean more - and as a reader I can put each point of view into context and form my own opinion.

When you read the BBC blogs, by people who claim to be independent, you can't tell, because you don't know where in the world their opinion comes from.

As you say, it's those who will die out. Because why pay to find out what Polly thinks, when I can just read a few blogs and get more information and come to a better judgement without her assistance.

10/11/2010 11:31:00 pm  
Anonymous John Demetriou said...

At last! getting your true, proper voice back! I like it alot!

10/12/2010 12:04:00 am  
Anonymous JuliaM said...

"When you read the BBC blogs, by people who claim to be independent, you can't tell, because you don't know where in the world their opinion comes from."

Oh yes, you do!

10/12/2010 06:59:00 am  
Anonymous Nick said...

Please do not knock a 2:2 in English literature, which was the supreme academic award back in my day [the 1970's], indicating that as an undergraduate the student had done the maximum amount of drinking/tail-chasing/insulting the entire assembled Left at student union meetings,etc., and who STILL managed to prove themselves as possessing a high level of intelligence, ordered thought, and understanding of the human condition via the Western Canon of literature.

10/12/2010 09:22:00 am  
Anonymous Jess The Dog said...

On a slightly different issue, I believe Alice Miles of the Times had a rant about feckless fathers who ended up joining Fathers 4 Justice...what could she possibly mean? And does the term 'love handles' have more than one interpretation?

10/12/2010 09:58:00 am  
Anonymous FlipC said...

As DK says at its heart this is yet another self-justification of "Why I should still be paid to do something that others are doing for free".

I think it's telling that rather than concentrate on the things paid journos can do better (chase stories etc.) instead the focus is slagging off the 'other side'.

Is it indeed because there really is little difference between the 'work' of most reporters of Marr's type and bloggers and thus the only option becomes to attack the person and not the argument?

10/12/2010 09:58:00 am  
Anonymous Ian E said...

I wonder if he has any evidence for his nasty, bigoted remarks? Certainly none of the bloggers whose appearance I know fall into Marr's rabid description.

In any case, is Marr saying that anyone who does fall into his attack category are in some way less worthy citizens, whose views have no right to be heard. Would he dare attack other groups of individuals in this way e.g. gays, lesbians, Islamists?

10/12/2010 10:29:00 am  
Anonymous 2.2 for ever said...

I have a 2.2 in English & History and I agree entirely with Nick. We used to call it a gentleman's (or in my case gentlewoman's) degree. I'm very proud of having done absolutely no work at university. It took me 6 months to dry out.

10/12/2010 12:50:00 pm  
Anonymous Katabasis said...

This is an easy one to solve potentially.

Let's invite Marr to the next blogger's bash in London.

10/12/2010 02:01:00 pm  
Anonymous John O'Connell said...

Outstanding. Reposted at :

.. while still laughing.

10/12/2010 02:18:00 pm  
Anonymous Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs said...

If I'd fathered a bastard love child with, let's say another journalist, such as, oh I don't know, pick one at random, Alice Miles, and then in an attempt to cover up my adultery applied for a D notice to prevent other so called journalists from reporting this and to my horror, found out that blogs were avoiding this restriction, then I'd be a tad worried too.

Especially as you say the entire excuse for journalism is going down the pan with the good ship HMS Dead Tree Press.

10/12/2010 02:56:00 pm  
Anonymous Snotrocket said...

Sorry to be off topic DK but Anna's blog seems to have disappeared and there's nothing on the web it indicate why. Any ideas?

10/12/2010 04:46:00 pm  
Anonymous Haribo said...

You could also have mentioned that these bastions of socialism send their kids to expensive west London private schools.

10/12/2010 05:00:00 pm  
Anonymous Dean said...

I officially love you for this wonderful blog!

Fantastic, I shall re-read it again ... bloody andrew marr ...

10/12/2010 05:38:00 pm  
Anonymous Foxy Brown said...

Vintage DK.

10/12/2010 06:44:00 pm  
Anonymous Brett Gerry said...

Marr's comments reflect a fear not only of new technologies, but also of the erosion of privileges they encourage:

10/12/2010 07:10:00 pm  
Anonymous Derek said...

What has happened to Annaracoon?

10/12/2010 08:02:00 pm  
Anonymous Assegai Mike said...

@2:2Forever: I always thought it was a Gentleman's *Third*.

Ref: Marr. By all means a Lefty hypocrite par excellence, but at least he asked Gordon Brown to his face on live TV if he was taking madness pills.

10/12/2010 08:13:00 pm  
Anonymous Sam Vega said...

"Indeed, Andrew. Perhaps, when we meet, you can repeat your assertions about bloggers and I shall read this post back to you. And then we can all get back to doing what we do best: I can return to insulting media whores like yourself"

Like you did with Andrew Neil.

10/12/2010 10:50:00 pm  
Anonymous Devil's Kitchen said...


"Like you did with Andrew Neil."

Should I be invited onto Mr Neil's programme when I am representing no one but myself, I shall be happy to call him a wiggy Scots shyster, or similar.


10/12/2010 10:54:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK


Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)