Current

Saturday, January 02, 2010

New year, old lies

Posted by The Filthy Smoker at 1/02/2010 01:30:00 AM

Rising alcohol addiction costs 'could cripple the NHS'

The cost of treating the growing number of people drinking heavily threatens to cripple NHS hospitals, warn experts.

If the trend continues the burden will be unsustainable, the Royal College of Physicians and NHS Confederation say.

And a happy new year to you too, you scare-mongering, lemon-sucking, compulsive lying, pointy-headed, neo-prohibitionist fucking cranks.

This non-story was published on the BBC website at five minutes past midnight on New Year's Day. It would be nice to think that some wag at the Beeb thought it would be richly ironic to put an anti-alcohol piece online at the one time when everybody is pissed, but a more plausible explanation is that the BBC wanted to start the decade as it means to go on - ie. with doom-mongering drivel from state-funded temperance dicks.

And which dick is mongering the doom on this occasion? Why, it's our old friend Ian Gilmore.

Professor Ian Gilmore, president of the Royal College of Physicians, said: "The nation's growing addiction to alcohol is putting an immense strain on health services, especially in hospitals, costing the NHS over £2.7 billion each year."

As I tire of pointing out, the nation has not got a "growing addiction to alcohol". What we do have is a new way of fiddling measuring the figures which makes it appear that more people are exceeding the weekly guidelines - guidelines which are, in any case, based on fuck all evidence. In fact, in light of recent research, anyone who wants to look after their ticker should consider 28 units a week to be the bare minimum they should be imbibing, as my gracious host reported back in November:

Men who drink regularly, even in small quantities, are more than 30% less likely to suffer from heart disease, it found. But those who drink the most cut their risk by the most. Those classed as high consumers of alcohol, between 30 and 90 grams per day, had 54% less chance of getting the disease, while those deemed to have a very high intake, of more than 90 grams or at least eight glasses of wine a day, were 50% less likely.

Besides which, estimates of cost to the NHS invariably rely on the notion that if people didn't die from [insert taxable pleasure of your choice], they wouldn't die from anything at all. Instead, they would lead an eternal life of joyful abstinence, never requiring a hip replacement and never troubling a doctor. 

And this sum has doubled in under five years.

They revised their estimate, you fools.

"This burden is no longer sustainable," he said.

Really? Well, since the annual NHS budget is £95 billion, it certainly sounds pretty fucking sustainable. But just to make sure, let's see how much drinkers pay in tax.

• HM Revenue and Customs' receipts for spirits duties in 2006-2007 were £2.2 billion, and are projected to be £2.3 billion in 2007-2008 .

• Revenues for wine duties in 2006-2007 were £2.4 billion, and are projected to be £2.5 billion in 2007-2008.

• Revenues for beer and cider duties in 2006-2007 were £3.3 billion, and are projected to be £3.4 billion in 2007-2008.

At well over £8 billion a year and rising, I can only concur with the immortal words of The Daily Mash...

"Following a quick glance at my tax bill I've decided that the NHS will treat me and the government can keep its fucking opinions to itself."

All Gilmore and his cohorts are doing here is borrowing a tired old trick from their fellow health warriors at the National Obesity Forum (whose credibility is in no way compromised by being funded by pharmaceutical companies who make weight-loss drugs. Absolutely not.) You may remember such news reports as this from 2007...

Obesity epidemic 'could bankrupt the NHS'

Tackling Britain’s obesity epidemic could bankrupt the NHS, a leading expert has warned.

It is anticipated that obesity could cost as much as £45 billion a year by 2050, to pay for growing incidents of diabetes, strokes and heart disease as well as the loss of earnings by those too heavy to work, a conference was warned.

Dr Colin Waine, chairman of the National Obesity Forum (NOF), said the financial implications of obesity were "huge" and claimed the Government would have to confront the food industry to tackle the problem.

And this from 2006...

Obesity 'could bankrupt the NHS'

The rising levels of obesity could bankrupt the NHS if left unchecked, a British Medical Journal report warns.

Experts, including government A&E tsar George Alberti and Glasgow University professor Naveed Sattar, said obesity treatment took up 9% of the NHS budget.

But they warned this would rise as the number of obese adults rose from one in five to one in three by 2010.

Pay particular attention to that last line. It's now 2010. Are 1 in 3 adults obese? No, not even close. Will these made up statistics and scare stories dominate the BBC's output for another ten years? You bet your sweet ass they will.

Labels: ,


Posted by The Filthy Smoker at 1/02/2010 01:30:00 AM


29 Blogger Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I was surprised that this story seems to have risen to near the top of the BBC's agenda but not really picked up on (I heard it mentioned multiple times on 31st & 1st on the radio). It seems in the public of the government, and by extension the BBC, we have nailed public opinion on smoking during the 2000's, alcohol is now the target for the 2010's.

1/02/2010 02:31:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"It seems in the public of the government" should of course be "opinion of the government"

Would be obliged if the host could change this or else leave this supplementary comment in place. A better solution would be for me to read what I've typed before pressing 'Post Comment' but I fear this will never happen.

1/02/2010 02:33:00 AM  
Anonymous Junican said...

From Junican.

It really is good that the medical profession have moved their sights onto obesity and alcohol. The more the medical profession spreads its wings, the more UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES will be revealed - damaging consequences. Of course, no 'professor' will ever be held to account when the economy is damaged. These 'professors' are like politicians - they appear, damage society, and then disappear.

It is clear from the lack of response to Climategate that the powers that be simply want the problem revealed by Climategate to go away. Where are the politicians DEMANDING that the facts should be revealed? WHY ARE THEY SILENT? WHY ARE THEY NOT DEMANDING THAT THE RAW DATA SHOULD BE PUBLISHED ON THE INTERNET? WHY ARE MPs SO STUPID AND SO IGNORANT? When I say ignorant I mean lacking in knowledge and lacking in ability to connect with their constituents. My MP is Ruth Kelly. She is a lovely Catholic girl, as I am a good Catholic boy. I admire her very much. I feel sure that she was misled by the unatributable and unknown people who actually make the decisions. It is not possible for the politicians to make the decisions since they know nothing. Unfortunately, my lovely catholic girl MP, Ruth Kelly, seems to have decided that it is OK for her to continue to collect her MP salary while doing NOTHING WHATSOEVER to justify it. How many bins does she empty in her constituancy? ((In her constituency, the bins have not been emptied for three weeks now). So sad.
Despite the fact that Ruth Kelly is going to cease to be an MP at the next election, why is she not jumping up and down shouting, "Why was I mislead over the climate business?" She should be shouting - on behalf over her constituents. She should also be shouting about the damage that the smoking ban is doing. But she does not. WHY?

1/02/2010 06:50:00 AM  
Anonymous Ian E said...

Did I hear the radio comment correctly - i.e. alcohol consumption in the UK has gone up by 20% in the last 30 years? Well, guess what - so has the population!

1/02/2010 08:35:00 AM  
Anonymous Pat said...

I wonder if a large part of the problem isn't a surfeit of news outlets, all of which are hungry for something dramatic to publish.

1/02/2010 09:44:00 AM  
Anonymous Wossat? said...

But...but...but...we need to think of the chiiiiiildren!

1/02/2010 09:51:00 AM  
Anonymous assegai mike said...

And, naturally, the killjoys at The Mail are off to a flying start:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1239836/New-Year-celebrations-turn-ugly-revellers-drink-excess.html

Geordie lasses - bless em!

1/02/2010 10:10:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Yeah and what about the 1.3 billion wasted on smoking cessation and products that have a less than 5% success rate.
Still keeps the "ugly pigs" in ASH in a nice little earner does it not.
Not to mention big pharma who makes the shit.

1/02/2010 11:15:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

start the decade

The next decade doesn't start until 2011. Surely they taught you how to count to ten at Eton....

1/02/2010 11:24:00 AM  
Blogger John East said...

I couldn't give a fuck if they launch a decade long persecution of alcohol. Whilst I am pissed off over the tobacco persecution because I don't have the space or the knowledge to grow my own, I'm quite happy, and able to brew my own beer and ferment my own wine.

What can the fucking leftie control freaks do to stop me?

1/02/2010 11:49:00 AM  
Blogger ENGLISHMAN said...

They must keep up the climate of fear,people are easier to condition when they are afraid,and climate-gate will not hurt them,for all "politicians"have learned a truth,that is that they can simply ignore the elecorate,and do as they please,and if any-one has not noticed everything that is "bad"for you and will be removed,fits admirably with the tennets of islam.

1/02/2010 11:51:00 AM  
Blogger View from the Solent said...

re John East: "What can the fucking leftie control freaks do to stop me?"

Make hops and yeast controlled substances.

1/02/2010 11:55:00 AM  
Blogger The Filthy Smoker said...

Anon 11.24,

I wondered whether some pedant would point that out. I recall the same tedious discussions ten years ago when people claimed that 1990 was in the 1980s and 2000 was in the 20th century, or something. I dare say that is technically correct, but as I didn't go to Eton and don't give a shit I will say now what I said then - shut the hell up.

1/02/2010 12:15:00 PM  
Anonymous Ian E said...

What is regarded as a decade is simply a matter of convention! {OK, it would be odd and illogical if it was less than/more than 10 years, but which ten years is selected has to be a majority choice - and the majority, by a long way, regard it as 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9. Indeed it would be rather odd to regard 2010 as one of the Noughties!}

1/02/2010 02:10:00 PM  
Blogger Curmudgeon said...

It wouldn't surprise me if home brewing and winemaking were banned - or subject to duty - in the next ten years. As the Righteous seek to jack alcohol prices up, it is inevitable more people will turn to maing their own.

1/02/2010 04:24:00 PM  
Blogger Mitch said...

Britain is bracing itself for one of the coldest winters for a century with temperatures hitting minus 16 degrees Celsius, forecasters have warned.

From the Telegraph.

Ot but its that global warming again.

1/02/2010 06:35:00 PM  
Anonymous I wish I was Scottish said...

John East wrote:
" Whilst I am pissed off over the tobacco persecution because I don't have the space or the knowledge to grow my own".....

grow grass then, it`s a doddle and heaps more fun.

1/02/2010 06:57:00 PM  
Blogger AndrewSouthLondon said...

I have no problem with you guys smoking. I have a problem with you forcing me to breathe your smoke - different issue. However "passive drinking" is mechanically more difficult to achieve, unless you go around buying rounds all the time.No justification for nannying.

On the up-side, with the explosive population increase here of Muslims who supposedly don't drink, the incidence of alcoholic liver disease should fall of its own accord over coming decades. That at least should please the Royal College, if no-one else.

1/02/2010 07:20:00 PM  
Blogger Curmudgeon said...

Andrew,

If pubs and restaurants were allowed to have separate smoking areas, then how would you be forced to breathe other people's smoke?

Indeed surely the same would true if there were a mixture of smoking and non-smoking pubs.

And can we have "non smelly fat bastard pubs" - I don't want to have to inhale their stench?

1/02/2010 07:24:00 PM  
Anonymous the a&e charge nurse said...

"the incidence of alcoholic liver disease".

Ahh, if it where only that simple, ASL - the toll goes far beyond pickled liver syndrome.

Think of all those cases of domestic violence, casual assault, injuries from pished drivers, depression, or even dementia, etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernicke's_encephalopathy

Still no need to worry when we can divert attention toward a sterile debate about whether or not alcohol prevalence is slightly higher or lower than it was 5, 10 or 20 years ago - that's what really matters, isn't it?

1/02/2010 08:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Rob said...

So people who don't drink don't beat their wives, suffer from depression or get dementia? Amazing!

A&E - when will you realise that the people who beat their wives (and husbands, of course) when they are pissed WILL DO IT WHEN THEY ARE SOBER.

Repeat 100 times.

As for the depression and dementia bit, for fuck's sake. Do you really think you are going to con people into believing that shit?

1/02/2010 08:52:00 PM  
Anonymous the a&e charge nurse said...

Have you never heard of 'Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome', or alcohol related dementia, Rob - it's not very nice I'm afraid
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernicke-Korsakoff_syndrome

The Royal College of Psychiatrists claim, "alcohol affects the chemistry of the brain, increasing the risk of depression".
http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/mentalhealthinfo/problems/alcoholanddrugs/alcoholdepression.aspx

Alcohol correlates with many forms of antisocial and violent behaviour - let's at least be honest enough to call a spade a spade.

1/03/2010 09:24:00 AM  
Anonymous the a&e charge nurse said...

"So people who don't drink don't beat their wives"?

I didn't actually say that Rob but this report makes for chilling reading, especially when we consider the profile of abusers, for example it is claimed that 48% (of those responsible for domestic violence) were found to be alcohol dependent.
http://www.crimereduction.homeoffice.gov.uk/domesticviolence/domesticviolence39.htm

Makes you think, doesn't it?

1/03/2010 09:40:00 AM  
Anonymous Simon Jester said...

Opinion poll time - who thinks that "the A&E charge nurse" is really:
a) Ian Gilmore
b) A member of al muhajiroun (or similar Islamist nutjob organisation)
c) Oliver Cromwell
d) A cunt?

1/03/2010 11:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Simon Jester said...

"Makes you think, doesn't it?"

Makes me think you don't understand that "post hoc ergo propter hoc" is a logical fallacy.

1/03/2010 11:27:00 PM  
Blogger Mark Brentano said...

I don't remember members of the public complaining in the 1970s when, if I remember aright, GPs as a profession had the highest incidence of both alcoholism and drug addiction.

1/04/2010 02:09:00 PM  
Blogger Beware of Geeks bearing GIFs said...

Love this find DK:

"Following a quick glance at my tax bill I've decided that the NHS will treat me and the government can keep its fucking opinions to itself."

I've decided 2010 is the year I invest once again into homebrew kits.

PickleLiverTastic!

1/04/2010 07:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Hang 'em all said...

Dr Colin Waine, chairman of the National Obesity Forum, said "the financial implications of obesity are huge".

Was that meant to be a joke?

1/05/2010 11:39:00 AM  
Anonymous Gutrot & Pancreaitis Distillers Inc. said...

Great work.cheques in the post.
Ooops!

1/05/2010 03:19:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Testimonials

  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK

Blogroll

Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)