Saturday, November 21, 2009

The significance of the CRU emails

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 11/21/2009 11:30:00 pm

Whilst your humble Devil is waiting for the rest of the world to finish watching Strictly Come Dancing and the XFactor and catch up with the fact that something quite momentous has happened, I thought that I would point out the significance of the CRU emails.

The whole of the anthropogenic climate change reporting and response is co-ordinated by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which produces substantial reports every few years on the current state of the science and economics.

The last of these reports—Assessment Report 4 (AR4, as it is referred to throughout the emails)—was released in 2007.

The scientific parts of the IPCC's reports have been based heavily on the research and reconstructions produced by The Club—particularly on the temperature reconstructions of Michael Mann and Keith Briffa. These reconstructions (usually involving a hockey stick graph) have been constantly attacked—and usually destroyed—by sceptics such as Steve McIntyre.

What these emails show is that members of The Club have presented, as fact, data which privately they have acknowledged to be, at best, flawed.

Further, many members of The Club are editors of the reports submitted to the IPCC, and the emails show that they have deliberately cherry-picked those that agree with their position—and conspired to discredit or reject those that do not agree with their political position.

The Club has also conspired to suborne journals, and to oust editors of other journals who are perceived as being unsympathetic to their cause. And they have been successful.

The emails show that, whilst claiming that sceptics' papers are not peer-reviewed, The Club have actively and deliberately used blackmail and smears to prevent such peer-review or, when review is unavoidable, to have conspired to skew the review process to discredit their opponents.

All of these actions render the scientific reports produced by the IPCC extremely suspect. At best.

And they most certainly destroy the concept of the "scientific consensus".

None of these emails disprove anthropogenic climate change: but they do shatter the idea that there is no dissent and, crucially, they absolutely annihilate the idea that scientists are impartial and uncorrupt.

And these emails most certainly explode the proposition that we should reorder the world economy because of an impending climate disaster.

Every single member of The Club needs to be removed from any post of responsibility; they need to be sacked from their jobs, ejected from the IPCC working groups, their data re-examined by independent assessors and their papers expunged from the IPCC reports—AR5 is due out quite soon and any inclusion of The Club's research—or reconstructions or models based on their research (as most of them are)—will lead to it being stillborn.

And then—maybe—we can make a proper, honest assessment of what is happening in climate science: until then, it is all just bunk.

Labels: , , , , ,

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 11/21/2009 11:30:00 pm

13 Blogger Comments:

Anonymous lotocoti said...

Unless one of those implicated makes that one way journey to the library with a bottle of Scotch and a Webley, I'm afraid the significance of this whole sordid tale will remain conveniently un-reportable.

11/22/2009 12:24:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The emails, the emails, the emails...

There were two folders there. Only one was full of emails.

The other contained source code and raw data that had been denied to McIntyre and the scientific community at large. A very dubious practice, by the way, and one that makes it essentially impossible to verify the models that have been produced. What's more, it ties in with known data irregularities as chronicled on the Bishop's blog, that McIntyre has been after for some time.

The emails are fine media pap. The real scientific scandal will lie in the analysis of the data and the model source code. Or not, as the case may be.

11/22/2009 02:04:00 am  
Anonymous Jiks said...

So far the MSM seems to be playing it down the "if we don't report it, it didn't happen" route.

There is a brief mention way down in the bowels of the Telegraphs online edition ...but it receives far less space than an article on David Tennants role in a climate change game...

Elsewhere mentions of the police involvement to track down the evil hackers, no mention of the implications. DK is quite right, this is a massive story, it blows the last vestages of credability for this religion out the water.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

11/22/2009 08:25:00 am  
Blogger The Gorse Fox said...

Keep up the pressure Devil. Disappointing silence from the MSM Sundays. But guess they've all drunk the Kool-Aid and don't want to look stupid.

11/22/2009 10:44:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well the mail is starting to get the right idea:

11/22/2009 11:45:00 am  
Anonymous Dodgy Geezer said...

All the emails indicating data manipulation are interesting to people who know something about the field, but won't really cause a scandal externally. The general public is not really interested in the details of the science.

But the emails indicating behind-the-scenes manipulation to remove people from posts are very interesting to everybody, and will strike a chord with all readers. These should be publicised as widely as possible...

11/22/2009 12:33:00 pm  
Anonymous Rob said...

They could have sent a thousand emails to each other saying that they made up the entire thing, it wouldn't matter - it's politics now, not science. Facts don't matter in politics.

Expect the alarmists to get even shriller in the months ahead, expect the media and the government to turn the screw even further.

11/22/2009 01:44:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It would be interesting to see exactly how far they (the CRU) would wish to take this in terms of legal action. I wonder if they would rather than persue this any further in terms of Police action on the matter they would opt for sweeping the matter under the carpet.
If this case ends up in court any good brief would be able to cross examine witness's at the CRU and go over the dodgy data - the reason being in order to put up a whistleblowing defence.
So expect no action to be taken and the whole thing to die a rather quick death.

11/22/2009 01:54:00 pm  
Anonymous Budgie said...

Excellent news, and keep pushing it, DK. It is the AGW believers who are the climate change deniers - because they deny that the massive, historical, natural changes can still be happening overwhelming any minor recent human induced change.

11/22/2009 03:40:00 pm  
Blogger jonathan said...

Sorry, but I have to agree with Rob. It is, and always has been, about politics, not science.
The MSM have no interest in reporting anything other than the 'theft' of the e-mails and data files. I predict that the contents of those files will not be reported, and that even if they were,and the dodgy data, lies, smears were revealed to the public, the MSMs usual 'fake but true' defence would see them right.
None of the scientists involved will lose their jobs, none will be punished (except whoever hacked the server).
" Nothing to see here, go back to sleep folks"

11/22/2009 04:41:00 pm  
OpenID manicbeancounter said...

With respect to the IPCC, you will need to "clarify" the arguement in terms intellible to the political classes. In particular, there is a considerable conflict of interest in the reports written & edited by a small number of scientists who have views that are open to question. In particular with the hockey stick v. a significant Medival Warm Period. Along with Steve McIntyres published review comments ( e-mails show this conflict of interest has resulted in a very one-sided and political paper.

The conflicts of interest have some parallels with certain published reports and accounts.
- With the later accounts of Maxwell Communications Corporations, where the accountants were manipulated into giving a favourable report through bullying and hiding of important documents from auditors.
- With the accounts of Enron, where the auditors colluded with the company in creating subsiduaries to hide the losses.

11/22/2009 07:12:00 pm  
Anonymous Generalfeldmarschall said...

Somebody (in a previous thread?) asked about Jo Abbess' reaction.
None, zero, zilch, nada.
Ignores it resolutely.

11/22/2009 09:28:00 pm  
Blogger Zach Johnstone said...

I hope this goes even some way to pricking the egos of the self-righteous majority of eco-enthusiasts who deem it okay to project their views with no consideration for the reverse argument...

11/24/2009 01:10:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


Previous Posts



  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK


Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)