Skip to main content

New expenses unit to conceal expenses?

Earlier today, the Telegraph reported that a new unit was to be set up to process and audit MPs' expenses.
Following the Telegraph's exposure of the full extent of MPs' use of their taxpayer-funded allowances, the House of Commons is set to announce a new system of vetting and verification.

A new auditing body, independent of the House of Commons staff who currently check MPs' claims, will be announced on Monday by the House of Commons Commission.

But it is the Times that points out that this is, in fact, a smokescreen to stop future scrutiny of the claims.
A Labour plot to suppress the future release of MPs’ expenses has been uncovered by The Times.

As the frenzy over MPs’ claims continues into a fourth day, senior figures from all parties will meet this morning to discuss how to salvage Parliament’s battered reputation. Plans to bring in a private-sector company to run the expenses department has raised fears, however, that the move is being used as a smokescreen to suppress future embarrassing revelations.

Senior Labour figures say that the future privatisation of the Fees Office to process claims would exempt receipts from publication under Freedom of Information rules.
...

The unit, expected to cost £600,000 a year, is being seen as a desperate rearguard action to protect Parliament’s reputation.

Sir Stuart Bell, the Labour member of the House of Commons Commission, said that the unit would at first be staffed by outsiders and eventually offered to tender for companies such as Capita or Cap Gemini. “It will be staffed by skilled people from outside Parliament and once the unit is established [plans] are already under way that it should be given over to the private sector,” he said.
...

Sir Stuart said yesterday that receipts would not be released for public inspection if they were processed by a private company. “Receipts would be available under FOI in the unit [when it is part of the Commons] but when they go to an outside unit they would not.”

Even now—when the full extent of their mendacity is laid bare, as they have been shown to be faithless and dishonest—they just cannot stop themselves, can they?

Even now, their first instinct is not to behave better, but to hide the evidence of their wrong-doing from those who are forced to pay the bill.

Fucking hellski...

Comments

BenS said…
We must place our implicit trust in the patricians.

Apparently.
TheFatBigot said…
As usual it will backfire and cause them more trouble not less. We will still be able to make FOI requests of individual MPs. They won't like that.
SoldDownTheRiver said…
There is more than just FoI avoidance here. Crap Gemini and Crapita are companies that have expanded enormously on the back of taxpayer-funded profligacy by the government and there is definitely a two way street when it comes to the flow of money. They would simply not be seen to be independent in the same way as any state-funded charity can not be seen to be independent. Dogs do not bite the hand that feeds them.
Jeff Wood said…
Sold makes an excellent point.

These companies are even more expensive than the fake charities.
European Movement said…
The European Movement and Euronews collaborate within the project “Questions for Europe” that encourages Parliamentary election candidates to answer questions addressed by citizens via YouTube.

“Questions for Europe” is a channel dedicated to the European elections. From the 4th-7th of June, Europeans will be choosing their new parliament. It will be the biggest transnational vote in history, and you will be given the chance to have your say on the issues that matter. We want to hear what you think: that will be answered by EP election candidates as well as experts and journalists or anyone who wishes to do so in order to put more Europe into the European elections. Euronews will choose some of the most compelling questions and play the answers during Euronews' prime time television broadcasts from now until June 12.

- Submit your videos before the 3rd June to have your say on the European elections

- Browse the gallery to view and respond to videos from other people

- Vote on the big issues! Participate in our opinion poll and watch special coverage of the elections

www.youtube.com/questionsforeurope

Popular posts from this blog

Apologia

Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.