Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Guess the policy

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 5/27/2009 01:07:00 pm

Your humble Devil would like to do a proper deconstruction of David Cameron's series of articles in The Grauniad yesterday but I do not, at present, have enough time. However, in general, I rather approve of what the man has said.

After all, as both Hannan and Carswell have pointed out, his proposals might have come directly from The Plan—a book that I wholeheartedly endorse as being practical, informative and a very good start towards a libertarian state.

Indeed, if Cameron promised specifically, and unequivocably, to adopt The Plan in his first year of government, I would vote Conservative (barring the presence of an LPUK candidate).

There are, however, some problems. Like Wat Tyler, I notice that there is no mention of the crucial relinquishing of fiscal control.
Well, it seems there are a couple of details still to sort out.

Like, how specifically is Mr C going to downsize government? He mentions some of things we've praised before, like school vouchers and elected sheriffs, and that's good. But he says nothing about some of the even thornier issues that would make a real difference in weakening the grip of the state.

For example, there's nothing on fiscal decentralisation - ie re-energising local government by making councils responsible for raising the bulk of their own money themselves, through local taxes on local electors.

And there's nothing about breaking up the massive top-down quangocracy that is the NHS. Where's that bold initiative on social health insurance, the system that removes funding power from the hands of ministers?

In fact, come to think of it, he says pretty well nothing about the driving principle of all modern power relationships, which as BOM readers will know, is follow the money. Reform without sorting the money is no reform at all.

Quite. If local governments have no fiscal control, then there seems little point in devolving power to them.

Plus, it must be pointed out that—admirable as Dave's position is—there is a bit, fat problem. Because this particular problem makes the vast majority of our laws: it is, in fact, the greatest power in this land. And its name is "the European Union".

And, unfortunately, Dave's position on that is rather far from clear, as this video shows (a tip of the horns to Trixy). Watch Dave try to wriggle as Andrew Marr points out the flaw in Dave's Lisbon Treaty promise...

Dave may not "let things rest" if it gets to that point whereat the Lisbon Treaty has been ratified by all countries, but there really is not much that he can do—unless withdrawal is on the cards. If that's the case, then great.

But one suspects that Dave has absolutely no intention of withdrawing or, indeed, of changing our relationship with the EU by one iota. (And don't forget that the Lisbon Treaty has already been ratified by our Parliament.)

Which means, I'm afraid, that all of his exciting proposals are just so much hokum or, as EUReferendum puts it, just Elastoplast over the fundamental wounds to our Parliament.
We ourselves take the view that, in response to Mr Cameron's soaring rhetoric, people are entitled to be suspicious and, after ten years of Blair, even cynical. Any politician needs to recognise that, and should not be surprised if their rhetoric is treated with a certain amount of reserve.

Not least, when Mr Cameron tells us: "I believe the central objective of the new politics we need should be a massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power ... from the EU to Britain ...", we need to be conscious of the fact that, in order to deliver on this – should it ever become a firm commitment rather than rhetoric – the government would have to abrogate the EU treaties and, effectively, leave the EU.

This would be a highly desirable outcome and it may be what Mr Cameron has in mind. The problem one has with this, however, it that nothing he has said previously has ever suggested that this is his aim, or that he has any intention seriously to engage with the EU with a view to securing a "massive, sweeping, radical redistribution of power." In the context, we would assert that suspicion is an entirely sensible response.

Quite so; and it appears, from PoliticsHome's latest poll, that the cynicism is not confined to we EUnihilists...
From a nationwide poll of 1,178 adults on whether a Cameron as prime minister would be as radical as he is promising on devolution of power, it finds that an overwhelming majority of the public are sceptical, predicting that he would be more cautious in office. In figures, a full 70 percent think Cameron would be more cautious and only 23 percent think he would deliver.

Cameron needs to convince people of his resolve and sincerity—something that is bound to be somewhat tricky in the current climate. And this humble Devil has yet to be convinced of either.

I'd love to be pleasantly surprised but, for the moment, we libertarians and EUnihilists should keep up the pressure on Cameron, to convince him that there really is support for both EU withdrawal and a smaller, more libertarian state.

Labels: , ,

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 5/27/2009 01:07:00 pm

19 Blogger Comments:

Blogger Tim W said...

I was at a speech other other day given by David Davis. He said lots of nice things about renegotiating our relationship with the EU - including that, should we not gain a far looser relationship, we should not be afraid to 'walk away'.

Sadly, he also said Hague was less sceptical, and Cameron still less so, so it seems his proposed hard negotiation will never materialise.

What a surprise.

5/27/2009 02:56:00 pm  
Blogger Dick Puddlecote said...

The lack of movement from Dave regarding moving away from EU federalism is indeed irritating. He seems to lack the guts to mirror the views of the majority of his party. Great news for UKIP.

"barring the presence of an LPUK candidate".

Like these, for example.

5/27/2009 03:00:00 pm  
Blogger Andrew Ian Dodge said...

Maybe Davey might change his mind a bit when UKIP do well in the Euro-elections. Probably just ignore it as a rebellion against the Labour government, but one hopes he might get the hint.

5/27/2009 03:19:00 pm  
Blogger Mark M said...

I can see where he's coming from when he says there are a lot of 'ifs', but they are quite likely 'ifs' and a Conservative government coming to power with the Lisbon Treaty enforced is a hypothetical situation that could easily occur.

I don't know why he won't answer the question because he's going to have to during an election campaign should the treaty be ratified. Thank god for the Irish, I guess.

5/27/2009 03:25:00 pm  
Blogger Lola said...

The more Dave speaks the more confused I am as to what he does actually believe and aim to carry out. What is needed is a complete and genuine reform a la The Plan. (Or I s'pose you could go for the nuclear option and reform a la Stalin, not Dave, obviously, but McBroon 2 might). I reckon he's not got the guts or the inclination.

5/27/2009 03:59:00 pm  
Blogger Nick said...

For example, there's nothing on fiscal decentralisation - ie re-energising local government by making councils responsible for raising the bulk of their own money themselves, through local taxes on local electors.
That's because its a crap policy.

Why should I suffer the tax aspirations of a looney left council who decides to super tax anyone earning over 25K as a fat cat?

The solution is to give every council a per head allowance. The same per head allowance for everyone in the UK.

1. The poor get subsidised by the rich.

2. Councils can get more things done, if they get more value for money.

3. No one gets ripped off.

4. No Barnet formula.

5. Very simple.

For example, lets say 10% of UK taxes is allocated to local councils. They get 10% of the total tax raised. Period.

If tax receipts drop, they get less. If they go up, they get more.

No need for council tax. Whole swathes of government get removed, making it efficient.


5/27/2009 04:29:00 pm  
Blogger Mark Wadsworth said...

I'm actually with Nick (see previous comment) on this one.

5/27/2009 04:37:00 pm  
Anonymous Rob said...

How many people actually pay council tax these days? Can a minority of taxpayers be fleeced for more and more services by those who receive the benefits but don't share the costs?

How accountable is the council to local electors? Despite my local council changing hands at least once in the past ten years, the roads are still full of potholes and the same waste goes on.

I agree with the principle that the more local power is, the more accountable it is. Unfortunately, local government would have to be massively reformed before we could get anywhere near that.

5/27/2009 05:16:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"a book that I wholeheartedly endorse as being practical, informative and a very good start towards a libertarian state"

It wants to rip up the HRA and the ECHR. It puts in its place a mechanism for the majority to avoid suffering tyranny at the hands of the state (for the power of the state will be restrained by local democratic power).

Fair enough. But what there's no protection for is unfashionable minorities suffering at the hands of a tyrannical majority. How are the rights of bankers, pistol shooters, violent computer gamers, extreme pornographers, drug users, S&Mers etc. to be protected from tyranny?

It's true that unfashionable minorities (e.g. smokers) are being stamped on right now. But the HRA does act as a brake in some cases (detention without trial for unpopular people, for example).

Ask yourself this: What would this foul lot get up to if the HRA didn't force restraint on them? And when the next foul lot get in to power (e.g. the odious Simon Heffer, who makes Captain Mainwaring look positively humble)?

The Plan rails about judicial activism when rights are codified. But I'd rather judges letting the odd wrong'un go unpunished if their activism also lifted the Government's boot from my neck.

5/27/2009 06:53:00 pm  
Blogger Ian B said...

The big, fat problem David Cameron has is is his big, fat head.

5/27/2009 10:43:00 pm  
Blogger ukipwebmaster said...

Breaking news! Servant's quarters funded by taxpayer:

5/28/2009 12:21:00 am  
OpenID cabalamat said...

Dave's position on [the EU] is rather far from clear.

The reason for this is actually quite simple. Dave doesn't much care whether Britain stays in the EU.

If Britain leaving the EU helps him become prime minister, he's for it.

If Britain staying in the EU helps him become prime minister, he's for it.

Do you notice a pattern there?

5/28/2009 01:52:00 am  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I read Cameron's speech,typical PR, all bullet points no narrative. I do not believe that he will go up against the EU, he has shown no signs up to now that he even understands the problem.
As to his localism, to do anything about this he has to stop the corrupt "cabinet system" put in
place by Prescott and forget local taxation. It currently takes over 11% of my income, a big hit for pensioners and the poorer parts of society. My council tax supports too many expensive councillors to say nothing of a useless, overpaid CEO. Meanwhile I am broke.

5/28/2009 03:36:00 pm  
Anonymous Budgie said...

Cameron has clearly said and repeated that the Conservatives will not leave the EU.

No renegotiation is possible with this stance. The EU would have to say 'No' to Dave, otherwise every country in the EU would be wanting a new deal.

However if Cameron pledged to leave the EU unless they accepted renegotiation then oddly enough the EU might be forced to agree because they would not want to lose the UK's dosh.

The moral of this is Cameron does not know how to negotiate; people instinctively know it and hence don't trust him. His policy is self defeating.

5/28/2009 10:18:00 pm  
Anonymous Verity said...

Cameron is an inept greedy egoist.

The thought of this individual leading a country with 1500 years of democracy as ballast is absurd.

He's so greedy for power that he adopted the protective colouration of the enemy and became the self-declared 'heir to Blair'.

Take him at his word.

Say 'no' to the Heirites.

5/29/2009 03:06:00 am  
Blogger James Higham said...

Your humble Devil would like to do a proper deconstruction of David Cameron's series of articles in The Grauniad yesterday but I do not, at present, have enough time. However, in general, I rather approve of what the man has said.

You should do it because you're the type of person who can do it thoroughly and then we can have something to link to on the matter.

5/29/2009 01:58:00 pm  
Anonymous The Hobbs End Martian said...

No need to fisk DCams' psychobabble - it immediately fails the sniff test, hmmm, I detect one half hundred weight of Bullshite.

Its the job of the Political Class to implement EU Policy, Common Purpose eh? , OECD Strategy eh? , the Barcelona Agreement eh? and all the other cryptomarxist crapola.

It'll take a frikkin civil war to change anything in this country, not gobshite from crooks and spivs.

Fuck 'em in the Arse and in the Eye, I say.

Fuck 'em all. Fuckers.

5/29/2009 07:03:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

thought you'd be interested... it has direct email to the emailers too :D lovely lovely

5/29/2009 07:11:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's pretty clear that he wants some veto powers back over key policy areas and also a proper working EU parliament with an actual opposition - which is why he is leaving the EPP.

unfortunately this also means that he accepts that we will continue to be ruled by Brussels and if it worls we will have the frightening prosepct of a working EU parliament that will be harder to criticise.

As ever with Cameron it is what he is "SEEN" to be doind rather than what he is doing that matters to him.

6/01/2009 12:25:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK


Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)