Skip to main content

David Semple: an arrogant, weapons-grade cock-end

This article by David Semple is absolutely disgusting in its blinkered arrogance.

I did contemplate fisking the fucker, but Bishop Hill has done such a fine job that any effort by your humble Devil seems superfluous. Here's a sample...
Collectively, as a society, we have a responsibility to our children - who are not the property of their parents and shouldn’t be treated as such.

And they are the property of "society" are they? You clearly think so. But if you took the trouble to check it out, you would find that children are legally the responsibility of parents. This is why it is not possible to sue the state when your teenagers take to drugs. Are you advocating that this should be possible? Of course not. When you say that children are the "responsibility of society" you don't mean anything of the sort. You are simply demanding a right to indoctrinate them to your personal preferences while avoiding any actual responsibility. It's the same as every other time you deal with the state—interfering busybodies get to tell you what to do but take no responsibility for the outcome. Teachers are not responsible for delivering a shitty education, child welfare officers are not responsible when children die. As soon as the state starts ruining the lives of home educated children they will not be responsible for that either.

Do go and have a read; amongst other things, His Ecclesiastical Eminence manages to link to actual evidence which David Semple—for all his wittering on about "the scientific method, skepticism [sic] and all forms of rational argument and the examination of evidence"—seems unable to cite. The cunt.


John B said…
I've never quite got the parent fetish so prevalent among right-libertarians, given that they're otherwise so keen on self-ownership.

To the extent that children aren't capable of self-ownership, why the hell (in principle) should it matter which group of adults exercise it on their behalf? Why the hell is it any better if Dave Jones indoctrinates Simon Jones with Christian rhetoric, than if the State indoctrinates Simon Jones with socialist rhetoric?

The result *in practice* is completely different, and the woeful outcomes generally seen for kids in state care probably justifies the current parenting model as the best one. But to anyone who believes in the individual, the concept of 'parental rights' beyond 'it's usually best to organise society like this' shouldn't have any meaning...

(also, the Bishop's "link to evidence" points to a blank page, which strikes me as rather dog-ate-my-homework-y)
Anonymous said…
My personal argument is that parents are more likely than the state or their staff to support the devleopment of children's self ownership and enabling autonomy in childhood whenever possible. I grant many parents don't do this but they are more likely to than the system.

This might explain a bit.
Not all parents who subscribe to this philosophy are right wing!


Popular posts from this blog


Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.