Skip to main content

Yet another fusion experiment

It seems that nuclear fusion is all the rage these days: here's another type of fusion—laser-ignition—that is about to be tested.
In the spring, a team will begin attempts to ignite a tiny man-made star inside a laboratory and trigger a thermonuclear reaction.

Its goal is to generate temperatures of more than 100 million degrees Celsius and pressures billions of times higher than those found anywhere else on earth, from a speck of fuel little bigger than a pinhead. If successful, the experiment will mark the first step towards building a practical nuclear fusion power station and a source of almost limitless energy.

At a time when fossil fuel supplies are dwindling and fears about global warming are forcing governments to seek clean energy sources, fusion could provide the answer. Hydrogen, the fuel needed for fusion reactions, is among the most abundant in the universe. Building work on the £1.2 billion nuclear fusion experiment is due to be completed in spring.

Scientists at the National Ignition Facility (NIF) in Livermore, nestled among the wine-producing vineyards of central California, will use a laser that concentrates 1,000 times the electric generating power of the United States into a billionth of a second.

The result should be an explosion in the 32ft-wide reaction chamber which will produce at least 10 times the amount of energy used to create it.

Although, of course, this is another American effort. Whilst they look to the future, here in the UK, we are still toying with windmills, the energy-generating efforts of the Middle Ages...

Comments

Houdini said…
Hydrogen, the fuel needed for fusion reactions, is among the most abundant in the universe.

Well, yes, hydrogen is the most abundant element in the universe, not among, but the most abundant. However, the earth supply is relatively small and finite; once it has gone, it is gone and there is no way to replace it short of going to the stars and getting some though there are some processes for extracting it from other elements, but that has dangers of its own and would produce only small amounts and negate the benefits of fusion technology.

Maybe we should get hold of a spaceship, like the millennium falcon, and we can start harvesting it from the milky way?

We'd make a fucking fortune, can you drive DK?
SantaToryB said…
If you have not read this yet...

http://www.countingcats.com/?p=1124

STB.
Roger Thornhill said…
Houdini,

The "shortage" of hydrogen for Fusion purposes is not a problem IIRC.

The isotopes needed exist in seawater. The quantities needed are very small indeed compared to those required for other hydrogen uses such as fuel cells.
Chalcedon said…
Wind turbines: I always ask the question; does the wind blow steadily all the time? No! Sometimes it's too fast, othertimes it isn't there. Tidal power is obvious and at twice a day, always available and predictable. This is of course if we are going for 'green' power generation.

I like the laser fusion idea. It's not that novel but will be interesting. There was a programme looking at ultrasonic cavitation in water and fusion generation for biodegradation of recalcitrant molecules but I haven't heard much about this in recent years.

All the Tokamak research seems to have generated is research papers unfortunately.
Roger Thornhill said…
Chalcedon,

Yup, tidal. predictable and it is not a blot on the landscape/seascape. As long as you do not screw up silt or migration, that is.
Neal Asher said…
"All the Tokamak research seems to have generated is research papers unfortunately."

Fusion might be at about the stage of development fission was just after 1934 when Fermi split the atom. 1942 saw the first reactor and 1954 the first one to supply commercial power. Maybe commercial fusion plants aren't so far away...

Popular posts from this blog

Apologia

Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.