Thursday, November 06, 2008

A quick word on Editorial Policy...

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 11/06/2008 01:01:00 pm

... which has been rendered necessary by the comments on the last post, especially this statement.
... in fairness to the people who leave comments here, it is DK's blog and is under his editorial control.

Basically, there is no editorial policy.

When I first invited other people to write at The Kitchen, some years ago, they were people with whom I generally disagreed, but who wrote decently. I actively wanted to stimulate debate within this blog.

In those days, it would have been absolutely and entirely wrong to assume that the opinions posted by those contributors were shared by myself—because the fact that I disagreed with them was the very reason that I invited them in the first place.

That policy has not substantially changed: many of the Lefty types have given up blogging, gone to write for The Grauniad (in one case) or returned to their own blogs.

One of the factors in this last result has been the virulent abuse they received in the comments. This is fair enough: I write what I want, and you commenters can write what you want (as you know, I never delete any comments (unless they are spam) and nor do I moderate said comments). However, one can understand that people writing here as a hobby do not necessarily want to spend their entire time being abused.

The entirely logical result is that those who remain writing here are those with whom I—and the commenters—generally agree. However, I should point out that I tell contributors that there is no Writing Policy—they can write about what they want, when they want and in any style they want. I occasionally tidy up presentational code but I don't edit the contributions in any other way—and nor do I vet any of them.

The conclusion of all of this, and the reason for this post, is to point out that attacking me because someone else has written something on this blog that you disagree with is neither valid nor fair (and vice versa, of course).

Expecting other contributors to The Kitchen to share my values and to attack either me or them because of what you perceive the values of this blog to be is similarly invalid.

And attacking libertarianism in general because of what any of us write is also invalid. The Devil's Kitchen does not speak for members of the UK Libertarian Party, let alone libertarians worldwide.

I realise that there will probably be more people in the comments to this post pointing out that I shouldn't bitch and moan about being attacked for stuff that I didn't write and that is fair enough—you are all entitled to your views.

However, I state all of the above so that no one can claim ignorance of the Editorial Policy at The Kitchen.

Labels: ,

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 11/06/2008 01:01:00 pm

19 Blogger Comments:

Anonymous Katy said...

Or, to quote Pink in "Charlie's Angels": the only rules are - there are no rules.

*motorcycle noises*

11/06/2008 01:58:00 pm  
Blogger haddock said...

"attacking Nazism in general because of what any of us write is also invalid" A Hitler

"attacking Communism in general because of what any of us write is also invalid" J Stalin

"attacking Nulabour in general because of what any of us write is also invalid" A Blair

11/06/2008 02:16:00 pm  
Blogger Devil's Kitchen said...


Oh, well done, haddock: you've got me bang to rights with your unbelievably sophisticated argument. That's it: I'll go and hang up my hat now that you've made me realise the error of my ways.

Fucking hellski...

The trouble with you, haddock, is that the only arguments that you ever answer are your own.

Let's take this gem as a classic example:

"so, what is the Libertarian position ? To close down The Mail ? To tell us what we should or should not be offended by."

No, quite obviously not. You know that that is neither the libertarian position nor my personal position.

"Much as DK can choose what to put on his blog, the Mail can decide what to put in their newspaper....if you don't like what they print, don't fucking read it."

Yes, quite right. You see, there you get the distinction between what I write and what a contributor writes. Well done.

But you still assume that said contributor is a libertarian, and you thus attack the perceived inconsistency in philosophy.

But the argument is invalid because there is no reason to assume that the contributor is a libertarian.

Do you see?


11/06/2008 02:54:00 pm  
Anonymous no longer anonymous said...


Hitler was pretty damn central to Nazi ideology. DK (no offence intended) is not central to libertarian ideology. Nozick or Rothbard, for example, would be more appropriate targets.

11/06/2008 03:11:00 pm  
Blogger haddock said...

"And attacking libertarianism in general because of what any of us write is also invalid." comes from your post of 01:01:00PM

which is by you, not a contributor

the quote refers to us writing... not him, they, or anyone else.... as you were doing the typing, I assumed "us" included you.

hardly worth bothering to find a sophisticated argument to nail such a silly statement, the simple one will do.

11/06/2008 03:23:00 pm  
Blogger Michael said...

The libertarian position is surely, what ever the individual person wants it to be...

11/06/2008 03:46:00 pm  
Blogger Obnoxio The Clown said...

the quote refers to us writing... not him, they, or anyone else.... as you were doing the typing, I assumed "us" included you.

I do so love a bit of sophistry.

11/06/2008 04:05:00 pm  
Blogger TheFatBigot said...

And there I was thinking you were going to announce a "be nice to Harriet" week.

11/06/2008 04:34:00 pm  
Blogger Henry Crun said...

I have a very simple editorial policy on my blog - If you don't like what I write about, fuck off. I don't really give a toss one way or the other.

@Haddock - you really are up your own arse, aren't you?

11/06/2008 05:24:00 pm  
Blogger Longrider said...

I have to say, I was a bit bemused by all this.

Daily Mail prints garbage (nothing new there, then).

Contributor to Kitchen takes issue with garbage.

This has nothing whatsoever to do with libertarianism, and no one has suggested any bans. It was a rant. That's it. Calling the Daily Mail journos and editors a bunch of cunts is merely an observation of fact. I didn't seen any suggestion that the Mail should be forcibly closed down.

As I understood it, all of this is merely an expression of freedom of speech.

Was I wrong? Did I miss something. Storm in a teacup anyone?

11/06/2008 05:40:00 pm  
Blogger Pogo said...

"haddock" And attacking libertarianism in general because of what any of us write is also invalid." comes from your post of 01:01:00PM

which is by you, not a contributor

the quote refers to us writing... not him, they, or anyone else.... as you were doing the typing, I assumed "us" included you.

That would appear true. However, it also refers to libertarianism in general and in arriving at your premise you seem to have made the unwarranted logical jump that DK, and only DK is "libertarianism in general" - unlike all the other "libertarian" contributors.

hardly worth bothering to find a sophisticated argument to nail such a silly statement, the simple one will do.

Well, I suppose it will... If you're simple.

You might just as well have claimed that "Elvis is dead. Therefore all dead people are Elvis".

11/06/2008 07:12:00 pm  
Blogger Dick Puddlecote said...

Think you're barking up the wrong coral with this one, Haddock. (see what I did there?) ;-)

11/06/2008 08:17:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So why Chris, you immeasurable twat, is there a fucking enormous box at the top of this blog saying "Libertarian Party Member"?

From what passes for your argument, we're then supposed to assume that actually that isn't relevant to the blog at all, but is relevant to you personally. But, as you've whined about in the past, 'you' and 'the blog' are different entities. So which is it?

Sort yourself out you fuckwit.

11/06/2008 08:19:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Big hugs all round - Storm in a teacup - Now let's move on and attack the E that's fucking U!

11/07/2008 12:59:00 am  
Anonymous SteveB said...

Should I try ecstacy again?

Crack made me feel very sick and no euphoric feeling at all, waste of money really.

Cannabis has nasty side effects, and caused a severe depression last time I tried that.

Heroin is a possibility, whether to smoke or inject though.

Advice/guidance gratefully accepted. (though not of the desist variety)

11/07/2008 07:54:00 am  
Anonymous anonymong said...

DK, why don't you just fuck off you utterly misereable bag of cunt juice.

11/07/2008 09:44:00 am  
Anonymous iain dale's manbreasts said...

9:44, there are ways and ways of trolling, and you're doing it wrong.

You will have more effect by being a bit more subtle, like me.

As it is, you're just a twat.

11/07/2008 09:10:00 pm  
Anonymous anonymong said...

I was just testing the editorial policy :-)

11/07/2008 09:32:00 pm  
Anonymous timothy said...

Obama appoints CTO for his administration

Is India ready for 2009 election?

11/18/2008 10:55:00 am  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home


  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK


Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)