Monday, October 20, 2008

I thought that there was something fishy about this...

David Cameron: close your mouth, Dave—there are only so many lies I can deal with in any one day...

I saw Call Me Dave's proposals for the VAT holiday for small businesses...
And today we are calling on the government to allow small and medium-sized enterprises to defer their VAT bills for up to six months. That means a typical small business with 50 employees, revenues of £5m and an annual net VAT bill of £350,000, doesn't have to find £90,000 to pay the taxman when the bank has just taken away its overdraft.

... and I thought, "I bet EU regulations won't allow him to do that." Luckily, EU Referendum have the time and the knowledge so sadly lacking in your humble Devil.
There are, however, just one or two tiny little problems with this idea. VAT is, of course, an EU tax, implemented via the VAT 6th Directive. A payment holiday on VAT would amount to a de facto reduction in the rate of tax, which is not permissible without the unanimous approval of all 27 EU member states, following a proposal to that effect from the Commission—which it not required to deliver.

That, though, might be the least of Mr Cameron's tiny little problems. Member states are required under EU law to collect VAT, a proportion of which goes to the EU coffers—known as the "own resource". Collection procedures are also defined by EU law, requiring the imposition of penalties on late payment—typically one percent per month. Changing these procedures unilaterally, guess what, is not permissible without the unanimous approval of all 27 EU member states, following a proposal to that effect from the Commission—which it not required to deliver.

Under certain circumstances, member states are entitled to adopt a simplified procedure for charging VAT, under Directive 2006/69/EC, but that does not include any provision for delaying tax payments. To the contrary, the Directive allows special provisions to enable member states to "prevent distortion of competition," which rather shows where EU priorities lie.

If these hurdles were somehow to be overcome, however, unilateral action by the UK in offering a tax holiday would certainly be considered a "distortion of competition" under Single Market rules. At the very least, Commission permission would have to be given, which will not necessarily be forthcoming.

And, since Mr Cameron's proposals affect only small and medium-sized businesses, larger firms might be moved to complain. A company like McDonalds, for instance, would have a just complaint. It regards itself as a "group of small businesses" under one banner. Fighting as it does for market share in competition with other high street outlets, it could argue that different rules on payment would most certainly distort competition.

There is also the matter of state aid. Broad-brush aid—which includes tax-breaks of any form, directed at one sector rather than applied uniformly—would most likely be considered illegal. At the very least, Commission approval would be required, which might not be forthcoming.

Then there is one other tiny little detail. Numerous studies—not least this one [PDF]—have drawn attention to the danger of deferred VAT payments, making the system even more vulnerable to fraud. This is already a massive problem. Would Mr Cameron want to add to that problem?

So, given Spam's proposals, one needs to apply the Polly Conundrum: is the massively-foreheaded cunt a stinking liar or a rampaging hypocrite? Given the resources at Master Cameron's beck and call (paid for by us, of course), one can only assume that he is, in fact, a lying fucking bastard.

Particularly galling is the beginning of the lying fuck's last paragraph.
Gordon Brown cannot hide from the truth.

Why not? It seems that you are determined to hide the truth from the British public, you hideous little shit—and that truth is that we no longer rule our own country and that you and your merry band of blues can do little more than tinker at the edges. For fuck's sake, man, almost every proposal that you have made, over the last few weeks, to fix this economic fuck-up would be blocked by the EU!

When will you actually start telling the truth to the people of Britain? When are you actually going to own up to the fact that every successive government in this country has given away more and more power—power that is only loaned to you by the British people and is not yours to give away—to an unelected bureaucracy based in a foreign country?

When, Mr Cameron, are you going to stop lying to the British people?

Stop. Fucking. Lying. To. Us. You. Lying. Cunt.

9 comments:

Elusive Pimpernel said...

I, for one, would have far more respect for him if he stood up and said "I think we should give businesses a 6 month holiday from VAT but the EU won't let us, we think we need to do something about that". Or words to that effect.

Maybe I'm naive but I would have thought that renegotiating our terms of EU membership would have been a popular cause.

Neil Harding said...

Apparently according to the FT, Cameron is telling the truth on this - Labour exempted some businesses affected by foot and mouth last year and it was allowed by the EU - so before you let your prejudices get the better of you...

Budgie said...

I think it is neither actual lying nor ignorance: it is worse than either. It is a refusal to accept reality.

It was the same with the subject of the USSR before the collapse of soviet socialism. Despite Solzhenitsyn and others, despite personal testimonies of shortages, starvation, brutality, constant surveillance, corruption and socialist fat cats, no-one in the political establishment would accept the evils of socialism.

It took Reagan, Thatcher and the communist collapse before people accepted the reality. Even now there are still some who cling to their socialist dummies, despite the evidence.

Cameron clings on to the unreality where the UK is still sovereign. It is too psychologically uncomfortable for him to face the reality of EU domination.

mister_choos said...

@ neil harding

The EU allowed it did they? That's fucking good of them. How gracious our masters are to allow us to decide our tax policies. I must write and thank them immediately. There should be now "allow" about it.
I'm really glad we haven't given any of our sovereignty away to the cunts, otherwise they might not allow us to make our own decisions. Oh hang on, they don't allow us to do they?

The Nameless One said...

Whatever you might think about Cameron, you've got to admit he looks smooth in that photo. Like Timothy Dalton in The Living Daylights, if Dalton had prepared himself for that film by eating too many pies.

Anonymous said...

I don't know, I think it's clever politicking if he wants to see a reduction in EU power... "I'd like to cut taxes, but I can't because the EU won't let me" will go some way to convincing the public, if it needed convincing, that we need to take power back from the EU.

Budgie said...

Anon 10:10am said: "I don't know, I think it's clever politicking if he wants to see a reduction in EU power... "I'd like to cut taxes, but I can't because the EU won't let me"".

Camoron left off the "but I can't because the EU won't let me" bit.

That's the whole point of the post.

Pogo said...

I could have sworn that when I first saw the "VAT holiday" mooted in the press it had a little sting in the tail - namely that the "holiday" was to be followed by a 7.5% "interest" charge when the payment was finally made.

Or, to put it another way, HMG would then charge credit-card-like rates of APR.

A Nice Little Earner.

Dave said...

Cameron and McBroon are two sides of the same dud pound coin.

And not one useful idea between them