Current

Friday, August 29, 2008

Hundal scores again!

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 8/29/2008 01:32:00 pm

EDITED: see this comment thread for details.

Sunny Hundal is very excited because he thinks that he has managed to catch me out; you can almost see him bouncing up and down with glee, his ickle face beaming into his mirror. One of his acolytes, septicisle, pointed to this little graph of the Gini coefficient, which shows a marked rise under the Tories.

Looking at the above graph (via), would you say income inequality has increased more under this Labour government, or under earlier Conservative governments?

I'm not sure that Sunny mentioned income inequality in his original comment. In fact, he said (and I quote) [Emphasis mine]:
... why not compare the increasing level of inequality between Labour rule and Tory rule, and then come back to me. I think you’ll find inequality increasing massively during Tory rule.

Now, that leaves his measure open to interpretation, don't you think? Still, never mind: Sunny is carried away by his thrilling denouement!
I think it may be obvious but someone may want to explain this to Cxxxx Mxxxxxx...

Now, I don't expect a common little man like Sunny to have any idea about etiquette, but the convention is that you refer to a blogger by the name that he gives himself. As I have stated many times, I am not the Devil's Kitchen and the Devil's Kitchen is not me: it is an aspect of me, but DK is not Cxxxx Mxxxxxx. I refer to "Sunny Hundal", because he proudly blogs under his own name, although I am not sure why: if I were writing the sort of moronic, single-dimensional, inaccurate shit that he does, I would want to stay very anonymous indeed. Still, each to their own...
... of Devil’s Kitchen, the idiot with tourette’s syndrome...

If I were a Lefty, of course, I would get very upset about this because although I do not have Tourette's Syndrome, one of the contributors to The Kitchen does, in fact, suffer very badly from that condition.
... and a penchant for writing sexual fantasies about newspaper columnists, who thinks this is rubbish. It doesn’t help does it, if you’re angry at someone saying nasty things about right-whingers, and then get it wrong yourself with irrelevant statistics.

Ah, yes, it just has to be a conspiracy, doesn't it, Sun—can I call you Sun? I, of course, do not consider myself to be right-wing: I am a libertarian which is something entirely different. No, I am not angry, Sun, I am contemptuous: you are, in fact, a contemptible little man—stupid, unpleasant, pusillanimous and with a definite aversion to backing up any of your assertions.

Still, this is to quibble. Let us consider the graph that Sunny presents us with. Now the Gini coefficient measures inequality between levels of disposable income and, yes, it obviously does increase under the Tories—and continues to increase under Labour, although at a lesser rate. But is disposable income a good measure of inequality?

Well, let us consider a couple of examples. First, let us consider a hypothetical one: take a worker earning the median wage of roughly £24,000 and compare him to a playboy with a £1billion trust fund who lives on the capital (this is a very silly thing to do, but never mind). Now, under the Gini coefficient, the worker would be considerably better off than the playboy: is this a true reflection of their wealth?

Or, why not consider a worker on the median wage of two years ago—roughly £23,000. Now, let us take me, two years ago: I was earning about £16,000 per year, but I owned my own flat—sure, I was paying a mortgage on it, but that mortgage was pretty small (only slightly higher than the average rent). The reason that it was small is that I was able to put down a large deposit on the property. Now, the worker on the median wage was not only earning more than I, but he also spent less on rent; but, at the end of the day, which one of us is actually more wealthy?

So, when we start talking about inequality, what do you think is a more meaningful measure—income or wealth? I think that it's wealth, which is why I quoted statistics on wealth. Where those statistics "irrelevant"? I think not.

Indeed, given the vagueness with which Sunny defined inequality, did I "get it wrong"? No.

Of course, as Sam Tarran points out, those of us who aren't jealous, evil little shits don't actually give a crap about inequality.
It's all very well and fun throwing the arguments of lefties back at them, and all very well taunting the mentally challenged, but why should we actually care? Economic and social equality is a distinctly socialist idea.

Of course in a free society you are going to have inequality. Inequality should be a source of pride. It is the badge of a free nation. It is that vague line that separates Hong Kong from the rest of China. It is the transition from freedom and diversity to uniformity.

According to his profile, Sam is 16 years old and yet his opinions are rather more mature than Sunny's, and Sam backs up his ideas with data and references.

Anyway, I make that 2–nil to me in this exchange. So, as I said in the last post, Sunny, don't let the door hit your arse on your way out of the blogosphere, you twat.

UPDATE: as per, Unity has written a superb—and typically lengthy—post on this subject. The main point is that inequality did rise in the 80s, but not necessarily for the reasons that you might think.

From a personal point of view, it is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether inequality rose or not, although I know that we got rather poorer (those 15% interest rates supremely fucked my family over for a while as we've never been high income).

My original point was always meant to be that Sunny made a fairly important assertion without backing it up with any kind of evidence—something that he was complaining about in his original post. Indeed, the wee laddie had to rely on Septicisle to find anything like the kind of evidence that he needed.

On both a practical and philosophical point, as someone who has spent all of his working life earning below the median wage (until, possibly, the last four months) but who has always paid his way, I still don't see why I should lose a quarter of my income (in direct taxes alone) to fund the lifestyles of other people—especially those who might be, in the case of Child Benefit for instance, considerably better off than me.

Labels: , , , , ,


Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 8/29/2008 01:32:00 pm


28 Blogger Comments:

Blogger QuestionThat said...

re. Sam Tarran: I was about to begin a post on a similar theme (connected to the report Tim Worstall has been all over today). It is an excellent point that needs to be hammered home - Equality and liberty are fundamentally incompatible.

8/29/2008 02:46:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This Sunny shap really is a left wing idiot, as all left wingers are.

8/29/2008 02:51:00 pm  
Blogger Longrider said...

Equality and liberty are fundamentally incompatible.

Equality is also unachievable. The concept is nonsense once exposed to any reasonable analysis - we all have different aptitudes and skills. Those skills have different values. Or is the brain surgeon's time of the same value as that of, say, the dustman?

My time is now worth far more than it was when I signalled trains for a living and I only need to work part time as a consquence. This is because I have earned the qualifications and skills to enable me to do this.

Those who carp on about equality merely expose their own naivete - not to mention envy, spite and mean-spiritedness.

8/29/2008 03:00:00 pm  
Blogger Blue Eyes said...

Cxxxx Mxxxxxx

I don't "get" the leftosphere's obsession with reminding us of bloggers' real names. No left-post is complete without a reference to Pxxx Sxxxxxx.

Strange.

8/29/2008 03:00:00 pm  
Blogger John B said...

Sam Tarran might just about be excused the belief that the difference between Hong Kong and the rest of China is income inequality, but solely on the grounds of his age. I mean, can anyone think of a more moronic proposition than "China is a state with low inequality of income"? It's got a Gini of 47, higher even than the US for Christ's sake...

@ Blue Eyes: obsession with 'ooh, look at me and my clever revelations' real names is hardly a leftosphere-unique trait.

8/29/2008 03:13:00 pm  
Blogger Blue Eyes said...

Fair enough, but none of the blogs I read get excited about it.

8/29/2008 03:23:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Inequality is a silly measure and, when you get down to it, it's pretty meaningless.

If I have £50 million and my neighbour, Bill Gates, has £50 billion, then we have some pretty stark fucking inequality - stark but irrelevant. If I have £1 and my neighbour has £1 then we have perfect equality - and also perfect poverty.

You can't measure the effectiveness of an economy through arbitrary media like inequality. You must measure an economy (and, by extension, the effectivenes of a government) by looking at growth, looking at relative levels of absolute poverty, looking at the provision of opportunity, looking at home ownership... When you do this, you see that the Tories since have always delivered. The Tories have left the country richer and the economy stronger; they have left ordinary citizens with more money in their pocket and more opportunity both to spend that money and to make more - and, in the process of spending and investing that money, they create yet more money and more employment and more opportunity.

I was 19 in 1997 - the election that year was the first time I got to vote - and I remember the optimism and prosperity and general sense of happiness that pervaded the country back then, when the Eeeeeevil Tories were running their Eeeeeevil Unequal Economy. I look around, just eleven years later, and wonder what the fuck has happened.

Silly question. I know what has happened. Eleven years of Labour raping the country in the name of equality is what has happened. Where the Tories tried to raise us all up and make us all rich, Labour has, in the name of making us all equal, torn down the middle classes and made everyone poor.

I'll be staying up late at the next election so I can watch as the SNP take that monocular cunt's seat from him.

8/29/2008 03:24:00 pm  
Blogger Stu said...

I use my real name on my blog - largely because I think it's nice to have at least some vague understanding of the person you're dealing with. All of my favourite blogs (with few exceptions) are either written under real-name bylines (Daring Fireball, Iain Dale, Coffee House etc) or have real names that are common knowledge (Dizzy, Guido, Devil's Kitchen etc). Putting a real name behind your writing gives a measure of accountability which is nice, like not leaving anonymous comments.

The idea of using a real name to deride an anonymous blog is pretty strange, though. Petty.

Back to the content of this post, another way to interpret the graph at the top is that inequality rose at the beginning of the Conservative Party's time in power, but was coming down until the rise of Tony Blair. What's more, the beginning of this drop in income equality was the recession of the early 90's. If recessions are causing drops in inequality, does that mean Labour are in support of recessions? (that would explain some things...)

Incidentally, Tom Harris is another one who's got funny ideas about Conservatives, inequality and poverty. In many ways that's more worrisome, since he's not just a random blogger but a government MP!

8/29/2008 03:33:00 pm  
Anonymous JuliaM said...

"doesn't it, Sun—can I call you Sun?"

Well, that's a little unfair.

The 'Sun' is known for its pairs of tits, whereas Sunny is demonstrably only one tit. Although certainly a big one...

8/29/2008 05:18:00 pm  
Blogger Martin said...

Chris,

I have posted the following comment on Hundal's blog -

"Dear Mr. Hundal,

I came across this post via 'The Devil's Kitchen'. I am the contributor to that site to whom Chris has referred as suffering from severe Tourette Syndrome.

It is disappointing to see your casual, lazy reference to what is an extremely debilitating and embarrassing condition on a post the topic of which has absolutely nothing to do with TS. Such references do nothing but continue to spread the lamentable misconceptions about TS which persist in the public mind. "

Interesting to see if it makes it through moderation.

8/29/2008 05:36:00 pm  
Anonymous Rumbold said...

Well, as QuestionThat said on Liberal Conspiracy, neither Sunny nor Devil's Kitchen are wrong with their respective arguments (i.e. income inequality verses wealth inequality), so perhaps this is just a storm in the proverbial teacup.

Equality isn't incompatible with liberty per se, its just that governments which pursue equality policies usually violate liberties to do so.

8/29/2008 05:45:00 pm  
Blogger Ian_QT said...

"Equality", in the strict sense of the word (i.e. ensuring that no one person is better- or worse-off than the next), is incompatible with liberty because the only way it could ever become a reality is through totalitarianism.

Some use the E-word to refer to limited redistribution. I wish they wouldn't.

8/29/2008 06:11:00 pm  
Blogger Sam Tarran said...

Sam Tarran might just about be excused the belief that the difference between Hong Kong and the rest of China is income inequality, but solely on the grounds of his age. I mean, can anyone think of a more moronic proposition than "China is a state with low inequality of income"? It's got a Gini of 47, higher even than the US for Christ's sake...

Quite. But Hong Kong/China was just a convenient metaphor of the contrast between a free state and an authoritarian (egalitarian) one. If this were twenty years ago, it would have been Checkpoint Charlie.

Sunny's graph doesn't exactly prove his point. If anything, it proves income equality has been fluctuating around a similar average since 1988.

Not that it really matters anyway.

8/29/2008 07:29:00 pm  
Anonymous Rumbold said...

Ian_qt:

I agree that in practice that it is impossible. But not in theory (which I suppose is irrevelent).

8/29/2008 09:00:00 pm  
Blogger Bishop Brennan said...

On the inequality / freedom issue, I would simply quote Hayek: 'Social justice is a mirage in a pluralistic society'.

Sunny Hindal is a twat of the highest order. Bastards like him would take away our freedom in the name of ideology and throw people like me in a gulag. Sunny can go fuck himself a million ways.

8/29/2008 09:21:00 pm  
Anonymous FrankFisher said...

You're not wrong there Len.

Thing about Sunny is that he's just not that bright, but he *thinks* is is - like all the lefties. And this is what makes them ddangerous.

Why they can't just read a fucking history book or simply *look* at the world and understand that socialism is evil, I don't know

8/29/2008 10:48:00 pm  
Blogger Ian_QT said...

"Why they can't just read a fucking history book or simply *look* at the world and understand that socialism is evil, I don't know"

Unfortunately it doesn't work like that, @frankfisher. We have to win the argument.

8/29/2008 10:51:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"(those 15% interest rates supremely fucked my family over for a while as we've never been high income)."

Didn't you go to Eton?

8/29/2008 11:03:00 pm  
Blogger Devil's Kitchen said...

"Didn't you go to Eton?"

Perfectly illustrating the distinction between wealth and income.

DK

8/29/2008 11:19:00 pm  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Neato. Am I to understand that your schooling was paid for out of your family's wealth, and that your family has/had enough wealth to send you to Eton? Surely then a 15% interest rate would be great for you because then you would earn more interest on your wealth?

8/30/2008 01:00:00 am  
Anonymous Sunny said...

Indeed, the wee laddie had to rely on Septicisle to find anything like the kind of evidence that he needed.

Awww... nice try there with the getout card. And nice try in trying to spin the fact that your own stats don't stack up either, as I pointed out in the comments.

But then, as you said, each to their own. I'm not losing any sleep over your stupidity.

8/30/2008 01:04:00 am  
Blogger John B said...

While I disagree with QT a lot (and I mean, a *lot*), he's spot on here. The concept that 'Stalin's purges prove that all redistribution of wealth is evil' is as moronic as the concept that 'the massacre at Hallujah proves that all Western involvement in foreign military conflicts is evil'.

Anyone (on either side) who doesn't get that point isn't worth debating. Yes, 'idiot who thinks the examples aren't valid', that means you.

8/30/2008 01:10:00 am  
Blogger Devil's Kitchen said...

"And nice try in trying to spin the fact that your own stats don't stack up either, as I pointed out in the comments."

What do you mean my stats don't add up? They are ONS stats, you fucking moron: they show precisely what they are meant to show and no more.

Fuck me, you are such a wanker.

DK

8/30/2008 01:41:00 am  
Blogger Devil's Kitchen said...

"Surely then a 15% interest rate would be great for you because then you would earn more interest on your wealth?"

I'm afraid that I don't know the ins and outs of the Trust conditions. However, I do know that my father started paying School Fees Insurance when I was born (I have no idea whether you can still get such insurance actually)...

DK

8/30/2008 01:43:00 am  
Anonymous fewqwer said...

Every leftist article on 'relative poverty' begins with the concession that it is unrelated to 'absolute poverty', and continues with a bunch of woolly-minded bullshit on the assumption that they are somehow the same. If you assume a falsehood, you can prove anything.

Why it is Sunny's inflated, sensitive ego that makes him a leftist.

8/30/2008 04:29:00 am  
Anonymous windy blow said...

Love that graph. Inequality increased under the Tories and has been perfectly well-maintained under Labour.

As always socialists don't get it: even after 11 years of Labour they still blame their predecessors for everything and anything. They never, ever say: "don't you think after all our initiatives we really ought to have done something useful and created what we always said was important?"

8/30/2008 01:03:00 pm  
Anonymous HSLD said...

Didn't Sunny write a bollocks whining article for the Guardian website along the lines of " Is it because I is black ? " a while ago and get comprehensively savaged for it by left and right ?

Or was it that other twat, Hairy Johann or whatever his name is ?

They all look the same to me. Socialists that is.

8/31/2008 12:20:00 am  
Blogger Chalcedon said...

We are only (allegedly) equal under the law. Unless you have got form of course or actually take a stand against yobbos and detain one or fight back.

8/31/2008 12:10:00 pm  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Testimonials

  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK

Blogroll

Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)