Skip to main content

This might be a contender...

... for the most cynical few sentences of the year—maybe even the decade...
There’s nothing particularly new, historically speaking, in the middle/upper classes having an attack of the vapours about the existence of a social underclass and all the social ills that go with it. The only difference this time around is that the UK hasn’t managed to address the problem in traditional fashion by arranging a war of sufficient size to cull the numbers of the great unwashed back to a manageable level, but to be fair to our political leaders, its not been for the lack of trying.

And yes, it did make me laugh. Nice work, Unity!


Anonymous said…
Unfortunately for Unity if you check the demographics for war deaths (at least in the last two world wars) then you find that casualties are highest amongst junior officers. Privates suffer a lower rate and senior officers the lowest of all.

Whilst the image of General Melchett sitting in a châteaux whilst his troops die in the trenches is appealing, you need to take into account that if such an old man were a private then he would have been retired.

Given that junior officers will be your "grammar school boys" it's not clear how a war will cull the working classes to a manageable level given that the managers are more likely to die.

At Trafalgar or Waterloo, the deaths were even more likely to impact the officers. On the Victory, the only people above deck were officers and marines. All the ratings were comparatively safe below decks. At Waterloo it was considered ungentlemanly to duck or dodge the cannonball coming your way.
Exile said…
Yes, junior officers, especially during the Great War, ran a far greater risk of being killed than my two conscripted grandfathers. However, there were far fewer of them, so if a platoon got wiped out going over the top, then that was one junior officer dead and heaven knows how many other ranks.

That is the point being made. In terms of total numbers, far more working men died than upper class men.

Popular posts from this blog


Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.