Skip to main content

Tax: what is it good for...?

Mr Angry is today turning to politics, in a vague manner, as he writes about a recent petition about removing VAT on fruit juice and smoothies.

This is what the No 10 Petition says:
"At the moment, all food (including things like hotdogs and crisps) is subject to a zero rate of tax. But people who want to make a healthy choice and buy smoothies and juices get taxed 17.5% VAT. It's a simple step, and, as more and more people get their fruit in liquid form, it could make a big difference. Our research shows that at least 500 million more portions of fruit would be consumed each year if this happened. Since we all know that eating more fruit and veg is essential to being healthier, it makes sense to help people make positive choices."

Now, we all know that VAT is controlled by the EU and, whilst our local government in Westminster has some leeway, it is still severely curtailed in what it can do.

Still, there is an interesting comment in the official reply:
Dietary based taxes were considered by Derek Wanless in 'Securing Good Health for the Whole Population' -published in 2004. The report highlights a number of difficulties of principle and practice in any attempt to use the tax system to influence diet.

So, the idea of using taxes to affect consumption throws up "a number of difficulties of principle and practice", does it?

So remind me again, what is the justification for the massive fucking taxes on cigarettes and alcohol?

Comments

Blue Eyes said…
During the 2000 fuel protests, suddenly petrol tax wasn't to discourage use it was to pay for skoolsnospitals.
John A said…
"So remind me again, what is the justification for the massive fucking taxes on cigarettes and alcohol?'

Oh come now. Tobacco was an easy sell as so few use it (relatively: in the US it is estimated at "less than twenty percent") and even they knew it might adversely affect health. Alcohol, we, Prohibition in the US was such a success that an incremental approach may sneak by.
-----------------
sort-of related -

A lot of pubs had to close when non-smokers failed to appear after the ban

But some pubs are doing well. How? um, er, ah... by offering an area where patrons can smoke.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/7376279.stm
Budgie said…
To paraphrase Eric Burdon:
"Tax, what is it good for?"
"Huh, Habsolutely nuthin' "
niconoclast said…
Didn't the tories raise VAT from 5%to 17%?.
Budgie said…
No.

They raised it from 15% to 17.5% to pay for the abolition of the poll tax.
Anonymous said…
To help politicians feel good - retail therapy
Chalcedon said…
You also pay VAT on prepared dog and cat food. So next time you buy your Felix or Pedigree chum 17.5% goes to the Gov.

They were talking about taxing fat in food and indeed junk food. Of course the food lobby was very negative as you would expect.

Sales tax was around 6%. Having a new sales tax at nearly 20% is really scandalous.

Popular posts from this blog

Apologia

Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.