Skip to main content

Libertarianism 101

Falco lays out the principles of Libertarianism very clearly. Like your humble Devil, he tends to concentrate on the Consequentialist argument, rather than the Rights Theorist argument.
Libertarianism is grounded in the belief that Negative Liberty is paramount. You are free to do as you wish, use and dispose of your property as you wish, (including your body), provided that you do not interfere with the Liberties of others in the process.

The result of this is that you are both free to act and responsible for those actions. You are free to get drunk for instance but if you hit someone while inebriated you are just as guilty as if you had done so while sober.

Libertarianism, almost by definition, requires a small government. Large enough to enforce justice and defend against those who would interfere with your rights but not so large as to spend its time interfering itself.

Do go and read the whole pithy post...

Comments

alan duncan's dildo said…
"Do go and read the whole pithy post"

No.
Blue Eyes said…
Yeah stop telling us what to do!

Totalitarian!
alexis said…
If you get rid of that spam you're a FASCIST!
Mark Wadsworth said…
I can't be bothered with principles, moralising or theories. My view is we need a nice long list of every ban that should be lifted in one fell swoop on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. If that doesn't work, we're f***ed, frankly.
Devil's Kitchen said…
"Do go and read the whole pithy post"

It's a slightly archaic form of words that constitutes an invitation, not an order.

And deleting spam merely ensures that Google don't get on my case...

DK
Heaver said…
See, that's the sort of thought-out libertarian argument which I support and subscribe to.

I was worried that the (largeish) anarchist-esque contingent in the US LP represented the libertarian concept as a whole for a minute there...

Still learning. :)
I was worried that the (largeish) anarchist-esque contingent in the US LP represented the libertarian concept as a whole for a minute there...

While we anarchist-leaners aren't in total control over here, there's more of us in the ranks than the Milsted Minions would like. Joke 'em if they can't take a fuck.

As for natural-rights ("Liberty is right") vs. consequentialist ("Liberty works") theories, I don't see them as mutually exclusive, but complementary to each other.

Popular posts from this blog

Apologia

Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.