Skip to main content

File System geekery

Here is a rather good Ars Technica article on the evolution of computer File Systems. I know, I know: it sounds deeply tedious but I actually found it quite interesting. Obviously, I know more about the history of Apple File Systems than any other, but knowing the limitations of almost every FS under the sun is a fun experience.

I particularly liked this quote, relating to the ZFS. [Emphasis mine.]
The Zettabyte File System, announced in 2004, is a 128-bit file system that supports files of ridiculous file sizes (16 exabytes) and an absolutely ludicrous limit of 256 zettabytes (2 to the power of 78 bytes) for the total accessible size of the file system. Project leader Jeff Bonwick said that "Populating 128-bit file systems would exceed the quantum limits of earth-based storage. You couldn't fill a 128-bit storage pool without boiling the oceans." It would literally take a computer made of pure energy, emitting enough energy to bring the entire world's oceans to a boiling point, to fill up the limits of a 128-bit file system. It seems unlikely that anyone is going to build a 256-bit file system any time soon.

All I would say to that is: never underestimate the ability of Adobe to make its applications grow to stupid fucking sizes. They'll boil those oceans yet...

P.S. Talking of geeky weirdness, you can now, should you so desire, follow your humble Devil's antics on Twitter...

Comments

Angry Steve said…
I was meaning to play with ZFS on my Sun E280R, but I just haven't got round to it... In the meantime, UFS, or VxFS will have to do.
Tito said…
Ah, Twatter. What a great way to whittle away the boring hours of state education.
Roger Thornhill said…
There were moves to bring ZFS to OSX in the Leopard release. It did not quite make it. Boot issues, possibly.

I like ZFS. Alot. The first file system I have thought I acually want to use since Files-11.

Popular posts from this blog

Apologia

Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.