Skip to main content

You can stop digging now

Everyone's favourite South Africa-based demolition and mining expert has an interesting post up explaining why geothermal energy simply isn't feasible in most places.
Sadly if one is looking for a universal source of clean and cheap energy, geothermal sources are still quite a long way away. That is not to say that these problems cannot be overcome. Engineers are good at performing miracles, after all. Hell, even the impossible can be achieved with time and money as the Sovs proved. But therein lies the true problem. The Russians took ten years and God knows how much money to sink one hole. A viable geothermal station would probably need several tens of holes. At current prices and with current technology the cost of establishing sufficient heat mines to make this concept practical are just too great to make it commercially viable.

Do go and read the whole post: I found it quite fascinating.


"Commercially viable" - the sole criterion of anything.
JuliaM said…
It is the only criterion worth mentioning if you are rying to get some poor sucker to invest in it, yes.
anthonynorth said…
It seems to me one problem with the great search for alternative power is ignoring a big part of the issue.
First of all, every physical activity we do involves energy. Are there engineers far sighted enough to theorise how to capture it?
Further, what about power storage? I think I'm right that there hasn't been a significant advance of the battery in decades.
Let's look at how to keep the energy we can produce without allowing it to escape.
TDK said…
I think I'm right that there hasn't been a significant advance of the battery in decades.

Anthony North, you should read Devil's Kitchen. In this post you will find a link to a blog telling us the latest news about batteries: They can make an existing lithium ion battery hold ten times the charge it did before, by changing one thing about them. Sounds like a significant advance to me :)

Popular posts from this blog


Your humble Devil apologises for his lack of posting: it has become increasingly difficult to actually put quill to vellum, as it were.

It's not purely that the political situation is rather uninspiring, it is also that I have become very much out of the habit of writing (about politics, at least). As such, every time that I fire up the blogging screen, I feel an incredible weariness.

I asked Pete to blog here because I thought that contemplating the actual mechanics of leaving the EU was important: I wanted to know, as much as anything. My reasons for voting Leave are actually very similar to Pete's, i.e. the rebooting of democracy and power structures in this country: however, he has a knowledge of the intricacies of the technical aspects that is beyond mine and I thought these worth setting down, here, for the record.

I shall try to post a little more frequently going forward. But, please, be warned that the reasons for eschewing this format haven't really gone away. My…

Gove's legacy?

Michael Gove has, quite honourably, said that it was right for Theresa may to sack him as a minister...
"I had six years when I was a government minister. I had a chance to make a difference - I hope that I did."The reforms that Michael Gove made in his time as Education Secretary will come to be seen as the most significant improvements to the British education system since the late 1800s—particularly in the introduction of Free Schools.

Gove made a difference—and his contribution should never be forgotten.