Current

Friday, September 21, 2007

Unions still stuck in the 70s

Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 9/21/2007 03:49:00 AM

Exciting technologies such as email, PDFs, etc. have absolutely shredded the Royal Mail's business; what profitable sections remained—parcel delivery, etc.—have been opened up to competition to other suppliers, under EU rules.

Unfortunately, the postal unions do not seem to have noticed and are preparing a new lot of strikes.
Postal workers are to stage two 48-hour national strikes next month in a row over pay and jobs, the Communication Workers Union (CWU) has confirmed.

The CWU said its members will walk out on 5 October and 8 October, with further strikes to follow if no agreement is reached with Royal Mail.

At the centre of the dispute is the CWU's objection to the Royal Mail's 2.5% pay offer and modernisation plans.

Are these people totally fucking insane?

What the CWU do not seem to have realised is that I really doubt is anyone really noticed the last time that they walked out; I certainly didn't.

Most communication—even invoices, etc. can be sent as PDFs—is via email. The vast majority of payments are now done via BACS or other computer-based transfer systems. Even those small companies who still deal in cheques will simply pay a competitor to courier urgent orders. The CWU don't seem to understand that they no longer have monopoly power and they can strike till they are blue in the face, and no one will give a shit: the CWU has no leverage.
The union claims the shake-up plans will put about 40,000 jobs at risk.

The Royal Mail believes that without dramatic reforms it will not to able to survive in a liberalised mail market.

Quite. And if the Royal Mail does not survive, then a good number more than 40,000 jobs will go.
"Despite five weeks of negotiations, Royal Mail have failed to take on board the union's message that in order for the business to succeed, Royal Mail need to invest in their workforce," said CWU deputy general secretary Dave Ward.

No, Dave, I'm really sorry but the Royal Mail does not have to invest in its staff. Being a postman is not terribly complicated: you might have noticed that you take on thousands of students around Christmas every, single year and they seem to have little trouble doing the job.

Walking around putting letters through doors may not be the most interesting job in the world, but nor is it very difficult. And nor is the sorting of them.

Your trouble is, Dave, that not only does the CWU have no leverage outwith the Royal Mail, it has precious little within the company itself. Every single one of your workers could be sacked tomorrow and the Royal Mail could probably hire and train at least a skeleton workforce in about a week.

And if the management threatened to sack all of your members as though they were US Air Traffic Controllers (whose bargaining power you don't have even the tiniest fraction of), how many do you think would stick with you, Dave?
"Strikes are a proportionate response to an employer that is completely out of control.

"Rather than running the business, Royal Mail's actions demonstrate they are intent on destroying it."

Give it up, you fucktard: the only people destroying the Royal Mail is you and your blinkered union cronies. Seriously, don't you get it? You aren't a public company anymore, so you can't cause embarrassment for politicians, and you aren't the sole provider of communications.

So let me repeat this: you have no leverage. None. Not one iota.

Furthermore, have your members increased their performance from 2005 levels? At the time, I wrote...
[Royal Mail CEO] Mr Crozier: turns the company round and therefore does his job. Bonus deserved.

Postal workers: not only losing 14.4 million items a year, but also having to be bribed to actually turn up for work. Bonus deserved?

Me? I'd say not. But then, I'm harsh like that...

But perhaps we should have some sympathy for the poor, wee workers, eh? Perhaps the pay offer is derisory?
Earlier this month, the CWU said that the Royal Mail had now upped its pay offer to a two-year increase worth 6.7%.

No, I reckon for a company that is still very far from being out of the financial woods, that's pretty generous—and it's certainly greater than the original 2.5% offer.
Yet the union added that the company was sticking to pension reform proposals - such as increased employee contributions and later retirement age - that it had rejected.

The Royal Mail countered at the time that it had "made it clear" to union officials that their aim was to "protect [our] existing people's pensions as far as possible and not increase their contributions".

Ah, it's the pensions. Hangovers from the days of state-ownership are they? Would this still be a final salary pension scheme perchance?

I think that it might be. After all, why increase employee contributions if you are not trying to hit a certain target? Look, Dave and cronies, these pensions are no longer sustainable: get used to it, you dim bastards.

Anyway, as I said, you aren't in any fucking position to argue; really, you aren't. I seriously suggest that you get back to work and shut the fuck up.

Labels: , , ,


Posted by Devil's Kitchen at 9/21/2007 03:49:00 AM


5 Blogger Comments:

Blogger Roger Thornhill said...

I must say I do notice when my regular postie is off, and we do get more awol and theft with a transient workforce.

The key though is the Union "activity" is clouding the issue - EU regulation, i.e. priming the EU postal systems to be run by Deutche Post.

The Unions should be fighting to make the Post Office free of the dead hand of Statism from the EU, but I suppose the Unions would then be fighting what they see as "their side". Not sure.

I always wondered why the Post Office did not re-fit all their Post Offices to include an Internet Cafe.

9/21/2007 01:12:00 PM  
Blogger Hugh Miller said...

roger,

Because they didn't see it coming?

Blind leading the stupid.

------------------------------------

Anytime we hear union bosses speak these days, it is always from the still nationalised or the recently floated organisations who have too many staff, huge hangovers from when unions had clout and an us and them attitude which gives away the true agenda.

State-Control = good.

Most unionists these days appear to believe that in a modern world everyone should be on a 20 hour week, 12 weeks holiday, flexi-time, creche facilities, blowjobs on tap and a pension that will pay them the same basic wage they work for.

Mention improving productivity or efficiency savings and they all turn into Bob Crowe.

9/21/2007 01:37:00 PM  
Anonymous assegai mike said...

A close buddy of mine gave up the rat-race a few years back to become a postie. He works an extra shift *every* day on overtime and he and his wife make up junk-mail pieces in the evenings for an extra £900 a month. Thus they recently bought their second home, it's a beauty. He's almost 50 and refuses to join any of the strikes. A few more like him and a few less Dave Wards and the Royal Mail would be well "sorted".

9/21/2007 05:46:00 PM  
Blogger tapestry said...

99% of what comes through the door is junk never read by anybody. I'd pay to stop it all if I could. Strike? Please do. Why not for a few years?


I have thrown away 15 years of junk mail at my current address. It must be the output of 15 sizeable trees. I have never even opened one letter in all that time, and I throw away the daily heavy tabloid admag too. It's barmy.

9/22/2007 02:24:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a small business owner ( http://www.rcdecorating.com ) I'm finding it increasingly difficult to function with the Royal Mail proving itself to be so prone to striking. I've made every effort to get clients to use email and online payments, but many still insist on using cheques and hard copies. Since my business is relatively small none of the alternative business mail companies can offer us a service.

10/08/2007 05:44:00 PM  

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Testimonials

  • "The best British political/libertarian blog on the web. Consistently excellent but not for the squeamish."—Christopher Snowdon
  • "[He] runs the infamous and fantastically sweary Devil’s Kitchen blog, and because he’s one of the naughtiest geeks (second only to the incredibly, incredibly naughty Guido Fawkes) he’s right at the top of the evil dork hierarchy."—Charlotte Gore
  • "I met the Devil's Kitchen the other night. What a charming young man he is, and considerably modest too..."—Peter Briffa
  • "The Devil's Kitchen exposes hypocrisy everywhere, no holds barred."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "People can still be controversial and influential whilst retaining integrity—Devil's Kitchen springs to mind—and attract frequent but intelligent comment."—Steve Shark, at B&D
  • "Sometimes too much, sometimes wrong, sometimes just too much but always worth a read. Not so much a blog as a force of nature."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "The Devil's Kitchen—a terrifying blog that covers an astonishing range of subjects with an informed passion and a rage against the machine that leaves me in awe..."—Polaris
  • "He rants like no one else in the blogosphere. But it's ranting in an eloquent, if sweary, kind of way. Eton taught him a lot."—Iain Dale
  • "But for all that, he is a brilliant writer—incisive, fisker- extraordinaire and with an over developed sense of humour... And he can back up his sometimes extraordinary views with some good old fashioned intellectual rigour... I'm promoting him on my blogroll to a daily read."—Iain Dale
  • "... an intelligent guy and a brilliant writer..."—A Very British Dude
  • "... the glorious Devil's Kitchen blog—it's not for the squeamish or easily offended..."—Samizdata
  • "... a very, smart article... takes a pretty firm libertarian line on the matter."—Samizdata
  • "By the way, DK seems to be on fucking good form at the moment."—Brian Mickelthwait
  • "Perhaps the best paragraph ever written in the history of human creation. It's our Devil on fine form."—Vindico
  • "Devil's Kitchen is the big name on the free-market libertarian strand of the British blogosphere... Profane rants are the immediate stand-out feature of DK's blog, but the ranting is backed up by some formidable argument on a wide range of issues particularly relating to British and European parliamentary politics, economics, and civil liberties."—Question That
  • "... an excellent, intelligent UK political blog which includes a great deal of swearing."—Dr Aubrey Blumsohn
  • "I like the Devil's Kitchen. I think it's one of the best written and funniest blogs in the business."—Conservative Party Reptile
  • "The. Top. UK. Blogger."—My Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy
  • "For sheer intelligence, erudition and fun, Iain Dale's Diary, Cranmer and Devil's Kitchen are so far ahead of the rest I don't see how they can figure in a top ten. They are the Beatles, Stones and Who of the blog world; the Astair, Bogart and Marlon Brando of the blog world; the Gerswin, Porter and Novello of the blog world; the Dot Cotton, Pat Butcher, Bette Lynch of the blog world..."—Wrinkled Weasel
  • "It's the blogging equivalent of someone eating Ostrich Vindaloo, washed down by ten bottles of Jamaican hot pepper sauce and then proceeding to breathe very close to your face while talking about how lovely our politicians are... But there's much more to his writing than four letter words."—Tom Tyler
  • "God bless the Devil's Kitchen... Colourful as his invective is, I cannot fault his accuracy."—Tom Paine
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is a life-affirming, life-enhancing blog ... This particular post will also lead you to some of the best soldiers in the army of swearbloggers of which he is Field Marshal."—The Last Ditch
  • "... underneath all the ranting and swearing [DK]'s a very intelligent and thoughtful writer whom many people ... take seriously, despite disagreeing with much of what he says."—Not Saussure
  • "... the most foul-mouthed of bloggers, Devils Kitchen, was always likely to provoke (sometimes disgust, but more often admiration)."—The Times Online
  • "The always entertaining Mr Devil's Kitchen..."—The Times's Comment Central
  • "Frankly, this is ranting of the very highest calibre."—The Nameless Libertarian
  • "I don't mean it literally, or even metaphorically. I just find that his atheism aside, I agree with everything the Devil (of Kitchen fame...) says. I particularly enjoy his well crafted and sharp swearing, especially when addressed at self righteous lefties..."—The Tin Drummer
  • "Spot on accurate and delightful in its simplicity, Devil's Kitchen is one of the reasons that we're not ready to write off EUroweenie-land just yet. At least not until we get done evacuating the ones with brains."—Anti-Idiotarian Rottweiler
  • "This hugely entertaining, articulate, witty Scottish commentator is also one of the most foul-mouthed bloggers around. Gird up your loins and have a look. Essential reading."—Doctor Crippen
  • "The Devil's Kitchen is one of the foremost blogs in the UK. The DK is bawdy, foul-mouthed, tasteless, vulgar, offensive and frequently goes beyond all boundaries of taste and decency. So why on earth does Dr Crippen read the DK? Because he reduces me to a state of quivering, helpless laughter."—Doctor Crippen's Grand Rounds
  • "DK is a take-no-prisoners sort of libertarian. His blog is renowned for its propensity for foul-mouthed invective, which can be both amusing and tiresome by turns. Nevertheless, he is usually lucid, often scintillating and sometimes illuminating."—Dr Syn
  • "If you enjoy a superior anti-Left rant, albeit one with a heavy dash of cursing, you could do worse than visit the Devil's Kitchen. The Devil is an astute observer of the evils of NuLabour, that's for sure. I for one stand converted to the Devil and all his works."—Istanbul Tory
  • "... a sick individual."—Peter Briffa
  • "This fellow is sharp as a tack, funny as hell, and—when something pisses him off—meaner than a badger with a case of the bullhead clap."—Green Hell
  • "Foul-mouthed eloquence of the highest standard. In bad taste, offensive, immoderate and slanderous. F***ing brilliant!—Guest, No2ID Forum
  • "a powerfully written right-of-center blog..."—Mangan's Miscellany
  • "I tend to enjoy Devil's Kitchen not only because I disagree with him quite a lot of the time but because I actually have to use my brain to articulate why."—Rhetorically Speaking
  • "This blog is currently slamming. Politics certainly ain't all my own. But style and prose is tight, fierce, provocative. And funny. OK, I am a child—swear words still crack a laugh."—Qwan
  • "hedonistic, abrasive but usually good-natured..."—The G-Gnome
  • "10,000 words per hour blogging output... prolific or obsessive compulsive I have yet to decide..."—Europhobia
  • "a more favoured blog from the sensible Right..."—Great Britain...
  • "Devils Kitchen, a right thinking man indeed..."—EU Serf
  • "an excellent blog..."—Rottweiler Puppy
  • "Anyone can cuss. But to curse in an imaginative fashion takes work."—Liftport Staff Blog
  • "The Devil's Kitchen: really very funny political blog."—Ink & Incapability
  • "I've been laffing fit to burst at the unashamed sweariness of the Devil's Kitchen ~ certainly my favourite place recently."—SoupDragon
  • "You can't beat the writing and general I-may-not-know-about-being-polite-but-I-know-what-I-like attitude."—SoupDragon
  • "Best. Fisking. Ever. I'm still laughing."—LC Wes, Imperial Mohel
  • "Art."—Bob
  • "It made me laugh out loud, and laugh so hard—and I don't even get all the references... I hope his politics don't offend you, but he is very funny."—Furious, WoT Forum
  • "DK himself is unashamedly right-wing, vitriolic and foul mouthed, liberally scattering his posts with four-letter-words... Not to be read if you're easily offended, but highly entertaining and very much tongue in cheek..."—Everything Is Electric
  • "This blog is absolutely wasted here and should be on the front page of one of the broadsheets..."—Commenter at The Kitchen
  • "[This Labour government] is the most mendacious, dishonest, endemically corrupt, power-hungry, incompetent, illiberal fucking shower of shits that has ruled this country..."—DK

Blogroll

Campaign Links

All: Daily Reads (in no particular order)

Politics (in no particular order)

Climate Change (in no particular order)

General & Humour (in no particular order)

Mac,Design Tech & IT (in no particular order)