Saturday, March 17, 2007

A Song For Sally Clark

Sally Clark, the solicitor and mother who found herself the unwitting victim of bad science and worse policy, has died at home aged just 42.
Hopefully she is now at peace.
Hopefully the arrogant medical charlatans who wrongly accused her of murdering her children will face their punishment in this world and the next.
Hopefully the fat, shaven headed, wheezing lumpen thugs to whom we delegate policing will respect her memory, and not whisper their lingering doubts over her innocence behind their hands.
Hopefully a political establishment and culture which for 40 years has sought to weaken and snap the bonds between parent and child will learn at least some lessons from a 'prosecution' that hid a persecution.
We live in hope.
That Sally was a solicitor has always been irrelevant to her case. The tragedy of Sally Clark, a woman wrongly accused of killing her own babies, has reached its last act, and the State which persecuted her might feel some relief at the thought of the curtain finally coming down.
That they should be so lucky.
RIP.

42 comments:

Shotgun said...

amen

Anonymous said...

RIP Sally. I hope all of the wretched dregs of humanity who's control freaked money and power lust destroyed your life are haunted by what they did to you.

lfb_uk@talktalk.net said...

Such a shame that she didnt get very long after being released. Her plight brought it all out in the open well done sally RIP.

CityUnslicker said...

Ellee has a good post on this too. What a terrible waste. At least Roy Hodgson will burn in hell for eternity.

CoralPoetry said...

Hi,

This is heartbreaking news.

Sally was so confident in the face of injustice. She was a lawyer and she knew the score – it wasn’t her place to argue her innocence – it was up to the Judge and Jury to find her guilty by the weight of evidence stacked against her, which was miniscule, which amounted to nothing, because she was an innocent person relying on idiots to defend her character and her life. She looked like a broken woman on her release.

Regards,
Coral

http://www.coralpoetry.blogspot.com

Chuck Unsworth said...

What a bitter and grim outcome. These last years must have been so harrowing for Sally Clark. I hope she is now at peace.

The blind arrogance of people like Hodgson and, worse, their inability to think that they might just possibly be wrong, is breathtaking. It is a true measure of their profound incompetence and venality.

My sincere condolences to her family.

JuliaM said...

It's at times like this that I almost wish I was a religious person....so I could hope her persecutors burn in hell.... :(

CoralPoetry said...

Hi,

Have you seen this SUSPICIOUS "tribute"? The world is full of these smug self-satisfied idiots.
.
.

http://mutated-unmuated.blogspot.com/2007/03/sally-clarks-death.html
.
.
.
Regards,
Coral

Pete in Dunbar said...

That is indeed one of the most despicable pieces of writing I've seen for a good long while.

CoralPoetry said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
DrD said...

What consumate tedious mind numbingly ignorant nonsense from a foul mouthed cretin who wouldn't recognise truth if it farted at him and backed up by the mad whose intense love affair with themselves allows the vicarious pleasures of vilifying those whose lives have been spent saving lives not festering in the caves of ignorance. You blocks and stones, worse than senseless things all of you(How am I doing, I'm not too good with the misogynistic profanities but I'll try if it gets your juvenile attention you fucking twits or is it twats in the playground nowadays?)
Sally Clark was not convicted because of the statistical errors of Meadow but because there was sufficient evidence to suggest that she killed her children.Both had signs of suffocation and Harry had muliple injuries including bleeding into his skin, brain and spine. He had a broken rib and a dislocated rib. Sally Clark was not released because of the evidence of Meadow but because clever lawyers were able to persuade the Judges that missing path results might have indicated that Harry died of an infection with a slow acting organism that somehow produced no tissue evidence of its presense and all this within ten minutes of being fit and well and sitting in his bouncy chair. Only the medically illiterate or a BBC journalist could believe that.The same journalist of such crass bovine stupidity that said it was impossible to poison a child with salt, particularily ironic when Meadow's first case of salt poisoning by a mother (the little boy died) was what drew to his attention that mothers may conspire to kill their children whilst appearing to cherish them.
You have a malignant ignorance which kills children and for that there is no forgiveness.Stick that up your tight little arse.

Anonymous said...

Dr. D. above who has a disabled link (so that nobody can reply) is Paul Staines aka. Guy Faukes, aka, City Slicker, aka Iznewmania, amongst a multitude of others.
Paul Staines has been outed as a troll in The Guardian in a write up as follows.

"Astroturfing is the coordinated use of blogs to spin a story or anonymous comments to harass bloggers and try to silence dissent.

Look up an organisation called GIYUS - they monitor blogs for posts that portray Israel in a less that supportive light and then post 'alerts' to members who descend on mass to spam the blogger with abuse and pro-Israeli comments.

They're one of the more notable examples - you could also just check out Paul Staines (aka Guido Fawkes) for a homegrown example of much the same practice."

Quoted by the Guardian

Dr.D. You are a home-grown turd and you are spinning your own shit on the potters' wheel. Your obscene perverted request has also been passed on to the relevant authorities.

Anonymous said...

OOOh – So much A N G E R. Somebody forgot to take his chill-pill. The crows are circling, the net is tightening and the walls are closing in.

Anonymous said...

Dr.D. posts from scads and scads of proxy servers

Information about outdated vaccination chemicals here:

vaccination may have been a contributor to deaths

Anonymous said...

HOWS THIS FOR SIZE DOCTOR D??

YOU ARE NOT EVEN BRITISH, SO HOW CAN YOU KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT A BRITISH TRIAL AND A BRITISH CONVICTION AND A BUNCH OF BRITISH DOCTORS THAT YOU HAD NEVER HEARD OF UNTIL MARCH THIS YEAR???

YOU ARE A WAZZOCK OF THE LOWEST ORDER. YOU ARE A PONCE IN WET PANTS. YOU ARE A CHARLATAN AND A CONTROL FREAK. YOU ARE AN AGING MIDGET WITH ALZHEIMERS STAGE 2.

DrD said...

Anonymous, thank you for the courtesy of civil discourse but may I ask for a moderation of volume? I know far more about the trial than you will ever do for you have no capacity for reason and as Swift said," one cannot reason a man from a position he wasn't reasoned into".Truth is too dangerous for you for it intrudes into the certainty of delusion that defines you.I am not aware that vaccination may break bones ,dislocate ribs and encourage iron filled macrophages only seen in suffocation to colonise the lungs.
Whatever is a Wazzock and why can't I be one of the highest order?

Anonymous said...

DR D.

Both children died within 5 to 8 hours of having an outdated, supercharged, toxic level of inoculation.

The bruising/contusions were caused by resuscitation efforts by ALL concerned and has been proved beyond doubt.

If you were British you would know the meaning of a wassock Just look in the mirror. You wouldn’t be allowed in Britain (you\'ve tried) because you are a stalking pervert.

Anonymous said...

DR. D

If you know so much about the case because you say you are an eminent doctor, then why have you omitted the fact that there was a massive bruise on the baby\\\'s leg which was caused by the first paramedic on the scene? The paramedic held the baby by the leg and turned him upside down, presumably to clear an assumed obstruction in the lungs. Nobody could tell if there actually WAS congestion in the lungs but this method of resuscitation was tried anyway.

DrD said...

I have never said I am an "eminent" doctor nor even that I am a doctor at all. The case against Sally Clark would be strengthened I'm afraid by your innaccurate description that there was a massive bruise on the leg. The defense were understandably anxious to play down the significance of such changes as they would indicate earlier abuse. You see, you have to have a beating heart to have massive bruises to push the blood out into the tissues and Harry was dead when the paramedics got there. The rib fracture was old and there was old blood in the lungs and there was bleeding into the skin. I don't think this fits with vaccine damage.

Anonymous said...

Dr.D,

And you sussed all this out from your barn. You are plain wrong. I have witnessed paramedics carrying out CPR on a dead person and he was left with many bruises when we saw him in the mortuary.

DrD said...

But if they were doing it correctly then they would be restoring a circulation and and an airway. Hence the bruises.

Anonymous said...

DR D

You stalking, plagiarizing ignoramus - most of the bruising had NOTHING to do with restoring the circulation. He was dead. We questioned the bruising and we were told it was the autopsy procedure and cleaning up that caused the majority of the brusing.

Anonymous said...

Dr D

PubMed_After Death Bruising

Anonymous said...

DrD

The anchor above broke.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10736761&dopt=Abstract

Anonymous said...

Dr.D

SIDS_See No.10


More about brusing caused by resuscitation.


10.
What caused the black and blue marks

Sometimes infants are bruised when resuscitation is attempted.
Other colorations that look like bruises happen after death.

DrD said...

Quite." Sometimes bruises are caused when resuscitation is attempted" for the reason I explained to you. "Other colourations that look like bruises happen after death" Indeed they do. lots of different colourations as the body starrts to decompose. They "look like bruises" but of course to the tutored eye they are nothing of the sort.Any thoughts on the broken and dislocated ribs?Any ruminations on the pulmonary signs of asphyxia in both the children? Any pondering on the hypoxic damage to the brain? Any passing thoughts on the
petechial haemorrhages in the eyelids? Any moments of reflection on the profoundly damaged
spine?

Anonymous said...

drd

Only a stalker pervert is saying this. I have seen the REAL bruising sustained after death. You are an idiot. Go back to your cell.

It is lights out time. Any more thoughts on luring young children to your websites? Because there's plenty of evidence

DrD said...

Goodnight, Anonymous. May you dream the dreams of sweet reason and awake refreshed.

Anonymous said...

DRD - aka Rob Cooper aka Celerman

Whilst we are on the subject of babies and doctors neglecting babies,, why are you NOT DEFENDING Madeleine McCann's parents (a GP and a Consultant) for leaving THREE babies locked up for at least an hour whilst they went to dinner?

I have not said anything in my blog because that will not bring her back, but I intend on making great inroads to prevent perverts from stalking families and their children as is evidenced by new Policing Laws in Britain. The Police can now stop and question ANYBODY under the Prevention of Terrorism Act for NO REASON in particular. I intend to give families and civilians similar powers to stop ANYBODY for stalking other people's children and that includes creating websites for that purpose, one of which is here:

www.debcooper.blogspot.com

DrD said...

I may not be a doctor in the formal sense of that courtesy title but I know far more about the Sally Clark case than all the posters on this blog and the other similar ones where a hint of the truth is intolerable and my delicate guidance is refuted with intemperate abuse or never sees the light of day.Truth is easy for it requires no design whereas the lie needs work to sustain it for in truth it has no substance. Tangled webs indeed.How anyone of common decency could introduce the notion that the appalling tragedy of the MCanns who just happen to be doctors bears on the duty of paediatricians to be alert to the murder of children by their parents is beyond my understanding unless I were to suppose that there are in this imperfect world souls so hostile to concepts that conflict with their own that they chose any means to defend their inconsistent and fallacious argument, even the agony of a parent's loss.

BLOGGING-CHAMP said...

Dr.D, aka TERRY HAMBLIN blog author

How would you know anything about Sally Clark? You aren’t British. You only heard of Sally Clark and Roy Meadows in March 2007.
.
.
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1832002
.
.
THERE IS NO HIGHER AUTHORITY TO CONFIRM THAT A PERSON WAS WRONGLY CONVICTED.

THERE IS NO HIGHER AUTHORITY TO CONFIRM THE EVIL PRACTICES OF CERTAIN (Dr. Mengele type) DOCTORS WHO CARRY OUT EVIL EXPERIMENTS ON BABIES IN HOSPITALS.
.
.
http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/316/7135/887
.
.
.
This is what the BRITISH police are saying about Roy Meadows, which I do not agree with. Roy Meadows carried out his job to the best of his ability, which was biased and derisory, as his wife will testify.
.
.
.
http://www.policeoracle.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4370&PID=111874#111874
.
.
.
http://tinyurl.com/2qf8fw
.
.

“We could start by "stripping" Sir Roy Meadows of his Knighthood !!!

Put him in the same queue as Jeffrey Archer”

DrD said...

Meadow, it's Meadow not 'Meadows'. You Don't even know the name of the man you defame with your consistent inconsistency.

BLOGGING-CHAMP said...

DRD

The spelling was deliberate. This conversation isn't about Meadows, it is about you, a slimy stalking pervert who sits around spamming somebody's website 24/7 and threatens to send a virus thereto. Well carry on. The recipient just presses the spam button and you and your threats get sent to the relevant places.

Anonymous said...

HEY, DR.D. WHO ONLY EVER APPEARS AT DEVIL KITCHEN AND APPALLING STRANGENESS - LOOK HERE

http://celiagreen.blogspot.com

Somebody else at the above link has the audacity to talk about Sally Clark\'s death and the most heinous miscarriage of justice ever carried out in the UK.

Why are you not jumping into that blog and the hundreds of others that express the same opinion?

Anonymous said...

Interesting review of all the articles on cot deaths going back over many years in the "Archives of diseases of Childhood" pointing out that two cot deaths in a family like the Clarks is "very rare indeed". Just as Meadow said.

Anonymous said...

DEVILS KITCHEN, aka Dr.D,Not-Saussure, Sunny and Appalling Strangeness and a multitude of others INCLUDING the blogger who masquerades as Professor Terry Hamblin.

Sally Clarks children were not cot death victims. Nobody EVER put forward this hypothesis. Double homicide by a Mother does not exist in any statistics in the UK on childhood deaths and has deemed to be almost non-existent.

DrD said...

You are right. The Clark children died in bouncy chairs in the space of a few minutes having been well and feeding up till then.Not what one understands by a 'cot death'.
However-" The Crown took the view that neither Christopher's nor Harry's death was a SIDS death because both were attended by unusual/suspicious circumstances suggesting death caused by a parent because of (inter alia) the existence in the case of each boy of unexplained recent and old injuries found after death. But until cross-examination of the defence medical witnesses, the Crown believed that the defence experts at trial would be mounting a case that the deaths were SIDS deaths, ie unexplained natural deaths.
109. The trial started on Monday 12th October 1999, there were 13 days of evidence in all, and it was not until the defence expert medical evidence was called (ninth to twelfth days of evidence - 26th to 28th October) that it became clear that the medical experts called by the defence accepted that neither death was a true SIDS death. But though the precise measure of rarity was not a significant issue by the end of the trial, the principle of rarity was. The appellant and her husband had not abandoned her defence that both the deaths were natural and true SIDS.
110. The Crown had sought to meet the issue - true SIDS or not - by evidence of the rarity of true SIDS deaths - death by unexplained natural causes.
Double homicide was deemed to be rare until discerning doctors uncovered the truth:

"42 children had been certified as dying from sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), and 29 were given another cause of natural death. In 24 families, more than one child died; 58 died before the age of 6 months and most died in the afternoon or evening. Seventy per cent had experienced unexplained illnesses; over half were admitted to hospital within the previous month, and 15 had been discharged within 24 hours of death. The mother, father, or both were responsible for death in 43, five, and two families, respectively."
Anyone responsible for this type of observation attracts the attention of those whose remit is the defense of the murderers and so it was that Roy Meadow, for it was he, had to be systematically vilified and defamed so that the most celebrated of the child killers could go free.
We abort our unwanted children when they inconvenience us, seek to kill them at birth(partial birth abortion) film their abuse for world wide audiences and free those convicted of murder using the professional liers of the Courts and the odious mendacity of the Press.

Anonymous said...

DR D, WHO IS MASQUERADING AS PROFESSOR HAMBLIN and NotSaussure who writes these messages and his blogs from Nashville, Tennessee in the USA:

YOU DO NOT KNOW WHO I WORK FOR. YOU KNOW WHO MY FAMILY WORKS FOR. YOU DO NOT KNOW MY ADDRESS. IF YOU DID YOU WOULD GO BACK TO YOUR MENTAL HOSPITAL AND TAKE YOUR MEDS.

Sallys children died of infections as had been documented by their GP in the days,weeks prior to their deaths.

FURTHERMORE The numbers of young, healthy people dying of MRSA,Pseudomonas, and other innocuous related infections is increasing. People who have never had a cold or flue in their lives are dying, today, in 2007.

Anonymous said...

DR.D. - DEVILS KITCHEN - YOU ARE A DISGRACE - WHY DONT YOUR DOCTORS GIVE YOU AN OVERDOSE AND BE DONE WITH IT AND FINISH YOU OFF AS YOU HAVE ASKED THEM. YOU ARE PROBABLY ON DEATH ROW ANYWAY SO IT IS A MOOT POINT

Anonymous said...

DR.D. - DEVILS KITCHEN

YOU KEEP ASKING FOR SOMEBODY TO KILL YOU. WHATS KEEPING THEM.

DrD said...

If someone is interested in the truth then he will not be discomforted by arguements that conflict with his own nor take it as a personal injury that contrary opinion might exist. Many people are not interested in the truth and once that has been revealed it could be thought of as rudeness to persist in an attempt to enlighten them for they do not want to hear or are incapable of understanding. Courtesy demands I desist.

DEVILS_KITCHEN said...

THIS IS JUST A SAMPLE OF TODAYS PRESS CUTTINGS


I hope that Prof Meadow realises what a devastating effect his\'expertise\' has had on innocent people\'s lives.


Professor Meadow has a lot to answer for.


Nothing can compensate the Cannings family for what they have been forced to endure. Angela and her husband have been to hell and back and are still paying the price. The toll on their relationship is too huge for any of us to imagine.


I wonder how professor Meadow sleeps at night after all the human misery he has caused.


Amazing how many lives can be destroyed by one man\'s stupdity and incompetence. We can only pray that the Clark and Canning families can move on from these fresh troubles.



You have bombarded ONE SOURCE with your ramblings and your schizoid paranoia. Now that you are well outnumbered, you say you will desist.

I have it on record that you have been ordered to desist. It was not your decision. You have stalked people. You have made threats of violence. You have threatened to send virus attacks, all grounds for the said cease and desist order against you.