Wednesday, March 07, 2007

A Passing Thought

With American productivity numbers looking shot; the housing market looking distinctly wobbly; the neoconservative, neoliberal gang who lied us into war being either convicted or under suspicion (memo to Lord Levy - the cash-for-honours investigation is not centered on whether or not you are a Jew, but a crook; the two statuses are not mutually exclusive, and the average British citizen and taxpayer is more than capable of telling the difference, thanks); perhaps application of The Galtieri Principle means that now might not be the best of all possible times to be in Iran.
Just a thought.

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

The Galtieri Principle guy is right; I have found a manuscript entitled "The Protocols of the Elders of Neoconservatism" which proves many of his points, and more.

You can get buy it from Amazon as soon as I can find a publisher not in thrall to the International Z#$^ Consp*#&

Sorry, the voices in my head took over for a while.

Martin said...

Anonymous,

This post's author (me) IS 'The Galtieri Principle' guy.

Spit out what's really on your mind.

Or do you lack the balls?

Anonymous said...

I'm with anonymous#1 on this one. I think he has stated what is on his mind extremely eliquently.

You on the other hand, have not. Your post is all fur coat and no knickers. As is your response to anonymous#1.

If anybody is lacking in the testicles department, might I respectfully suggest that it is you.

Maybe your tinfoil hat is not as impenetrable as you thought. I blame bushhitler mcChimpyhalliburton.

Martin said...

Well, one can see that the quality of comment rising all the time.

Do neither of you brave 'Anons' actually want to tackle (so to speak) the post's contents?

Or is smear and innuendo the order of the day.

And it's 'Chimpymcbushitler'. You can't even get that right.

Anonymous said...

Smear and innuendo is the starting and end point of your post. Jooos are thieves, Bush is a lying warmonger, and needs to go to war with Iran to deflect attention from Libby. WTF ?

As far as tackling your post's contents in detail goes, the basis for your inane theories indicate that a logical arguement will have no effect whatsoever, and thus pointless.

"bushhitler mcChimpyhalliburton" works for me. Are you that much of a thick cunt that you don't recognise parody when you see it ?

Martin said...

Where did I write 'Jooos are thieves'?

Where did I write this?

Nowhere.

You are therefore a liar.

This post and these comments have my name on them - what's yours?

Do you lack the courage of your convictions? To stand up for your beliefs?

"Bush is a lying warmonger"

What other conclusion supports the facts?

How many innocent American, British and Iraqi people have to die in Iraq before that truth is shouted from the rooftops?

Or is your bloodlust insatiable?

"...and needs to go to war with Iran to deflect attention from Libby"

Where did I say 'needs'?

I have suggested it as a possible outcome of the worst American administration in history's current morass.

Nowhere have I suggested that it is essential.

"As far as tackling your post's contents in detail goes, the basis for your inane theories indicate that a logical arguement will have no effect whatsoever, and thus pointless."

Rhetoric of a standard of which even a high school debater would be ashamed.

""bushhitler mcChimpyhalliburton" works for me. Are you that much of a thick cunt that you don't recognise parody when you see it ?"

If in doubt, play the man and not the ball.

Neat.

Who's next?

Anonymous said...

"What other conclusion supports the facts". - The facts are that the US congress voted by around 97 votes to nil to authorise the war. Democrats, Republicans, Independants.

Thats the problem with you tinfoil hatters, not only do you like to have your own opinions, you also like to have your own "facts" too.

"If in doubt, play the man and not the ball" - If being called a thick cunt somehow invalidates the thrust of an arguement, I would suggest that you have a short chat with DK on this subject. Pillock.

Martin said...

"The facts are that the US congress voted by around 97 votes to nil to authorise the war. Democrats, Republicans, Independants." -

Or even the Independents, but we'll let that one pass.

I vaguely recall some mention of the words 'Weapons of Mass Destruction' at that time...and 'yellowcake'...

Votes are cast on the basis of the information the voters are supplied with. Feed them lies, they vote on the basis of lies.

"Thats the problem with you tinfoil hatters, not only do you like to have your own opinions, you also like to have your own "facts" too."

Well, it seems indisputable that not one item which might possibly be labelled a Weapon of Mass Destruction has ben found thus far in Iraq.

"If being called a thick cunt somehow invalidates the thrust of an arguement, I would suggest that you have a short chat with DK on this subject. Pillock"

Arguement? Is English your first language?

While proudly profane, DK deals in arguments, not abuse for its own sake. You, on the other hand, do not.

What's your name again?

Anonymous said...

No, English is not my first language. You have a problem with that ?

Intel by the CIA

"DK deals in arguments, not abuse for its own sake. You, on the other hand, do not" - your comprehension skills are as sadly lacking as your social skills.

"What's your name again? " Anonymous #2, Having trouble reading ?

Martin said...

"No, English is not my first language. You have a problem with that?"

When being insulted in it, yes.

Sheesh, who wrote the English course you took? Quentin Tarantino?

"your comprehension skills are as sadly lacking as your social skills"

Which of have used pejoratives towards the other? And which of us has not addressed the other's argument?

"What's your name again? " Anonymous #2, Having trouble reading?"

No.

What is your name?