Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Miliband is an arsehole: part the... oh, I've lost count...

Well, after an eleven hour journey, I have finally moved my life to London. And so I shall booze for Christmas and become deeply motivated in the new year, oh yes I will.

Anyway, just to convince my lovely readers (that's a compliment and the only Christmas treat anyone's getting from me. Humbug!) that I am not dead, I shall entertain you with some more foolishness from Miliband.
There was renewed interest last week in the idea of personal carbon allowances as a progressive and effective tool in helping individuals fight climate change.

Yes, amongst the very stupid and the analogous MSM...
But what about their name?

David Chaytor MP believes we need something more catchy and suggests 'personal pollution permits'. Further suggestions gratefully received.

The name? The fucking name? For fuck's sake, what is this: a PR brainstorming session? So, I left a comment which (to their credit) Miliband's blog moderators let through unedited.
How about "Fraudulent Science Cards"? Or maybe "Knee-Jerk Reaction Permits". Personally, I favour "Miliband's Folly".

This is so typical of NuLabour, it really is; and you, David, are one of the worst exponents of this attitude. And what I refer to is the fact that, despite numerous people pointing out here -- with as much evidence to back them as you have for your claims -- that the science is at best inconclusive and at worst fraudulent, you have consistently ignored these protests.

Instead, you are pressing ahead with a scheme which will be unworkable, intrusive, expensive and will not achieve the result that you want; and the thing that you are most concerned about is the NAME?

David, communication is a two-way street: you, like all politicians, seem to be utterly ignoring the protestations of people who are -- in the main -- far more knowledgeable than yourself, and then you have the audacity to claim that this blog is an exercise in communication.

You are a fraud, a hypocrite and a liar. Now, just do us the favour of admitting it and remove this expensive exercise in futility.

DK

Bizarrely, I was attacked for using a pseudonym. So, I responded—under my own name—to one of the more literate commenters, Zoe F.
and DK, if you want to 'smack-talk', do it to ppls faces (i.e in person, not hiding behind a 'Devil's Advocate' pseudonym

And now you know my real name: does it make one iota of difference? Do you "know" me better? Nope. This might just as well be a pseudonym: the difference is, ironically, that David does know who the Devil's Kitchen is (indeed, he has quoted me) but he has no idea who Chris M****** is.
(I've read the BBC article where certain arguers attack the _person_ making the argument rather than the argument itself to distract from the case in point, so there. Bad Form, man, tut tut)

It's called an ad hominem argument. I have provided links and information to the arguments many, many times; both here and on my blog.
no-one should be able to argue against the fact that certain man-made concoctions are what are making some people allergy prone and/or ill etc etc...


*sigh*

Are you saying that no one should be allowed to (which means that you disagree with the concept of free speech) or that no one should be able to produce science which rather strongly implies that allergies, etc. are actually caused by a lack of exposure to "dirt" (which would make you a fool)?

Good lord, even David tries to back up his arguments (occasionally).

DK

The only people more stupid than Miliband hanging around that site are his commenters.

Merry fucking Chrstmas!

8 comments:

Angry Steve said...

Personal carbon allowances? What utter shite.

Does this mean after a few pints of "Trade Winds" or similar fine ale, my farts will count - well it's a pollutant, isn't it?

These people need a slap.

Anonymous said...

The idea of the lefties setting up some sort of 'market' for carbon is just bollocks of the first order.

Will I get credit for planting trees in my garden?

ill-conceived tosh as usual from Miliband.

At least DK can rip it to shreds in a way which settles my temper.

Rigger Mortice said...

'The idea of the lefties setting up some sort of 'market' for carbon is just bollocks of the first order'

but maybe one that could make a lot us rich!!!

zanu lab are very much an inverted robin hood-robbing the poor to give to the rich

Happy Christmas DK and all

PETER said...

Hi D.K. The online Times has an article on blogs today and they said your foul mouthed. Where do those sanctimonious fuckers get that from.Your writing is nectar for an antipolitico like me.
MERRY CHRISTMAS AND HAPPY NEW YEAR.

Andrew Zalotocky said...

The proper name for personal carbon allowances is "rationing". But while food rationing was imposed during WWII as a result of necessity, Miliband's fuel and electricity rationing would be imposed during a time of unprecedented plenty as a result of ideology.

FlyingRodent said...

A belated Merry Christmas mate, I forgot to include you on my list.

If you're asking for suggestions for New Year's resolutions, I'd propose that you consider chilling the fuck out.

I've never been as angry about anything as you are about everything.

Take time to sniff the roses, that's what it's all about.

A happy New Year when it comes, and I suggest you get battered into the port!

AntiCitizenOne said...

I think the term "breath ration" is the catchy term they were looking for.

Anyone who thinks CO2 is a pollutant has never tried growing "grass" indoors.

Snafu said...

Personal carbon allowances? Will we be taxed each time we fart now!?!

Gordon's Wind tax, I can see it now!